<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FireSociety Forums - The FireWire - Inside the Beltway</title>
    <link>http://www.firesociety.com</link>
    <description>FireSociety Forums - The FireWire - Inside the Beltway</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <webMaster>admin@firesociety.com</webMaster>
    <generator>FireSociety</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <title>Liberal Socialist Maxine Waters EXPOSED!</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/27254/Liberal-Socialist-Maxine-Waters-EXPOSED-/?src=103</link>
      <description>The ignorance and stupidity of our elected officials never ceases to amaze me.... Here&amp;#39;s a great clip with audio of Maxine Waters IDIOTIC faux pas.... She ADMITS that liberals are all for socialism and tells the oil companies that the government is going to take over their businesses!&amp;nbsp;HELLO MAXINE? This is the USA not the USSR! Take a look...love the commentary by Rush: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP-VsBPnVHU &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>(CM) BiotechBabe</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/27254/Liberal-Socialist-Maxine-Waters-EXPOSED-/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Official Ted Kennedy Cackle Thread</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26998/The-Official-Ted-Kennedy-Cackle-Thread/?src=103</link>
      <description>I was going to tell a joke .....&amp;nbsp;a no brainer.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>(CM) theSuperPatriot</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26998/The-Official-Ted-Kennedy-Cackle-Thread/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Loss of Independence  by Patrick J. Buchanan</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/27257/The-Loss-of-Independence--by-Patrick-J.-Buchanan/?src=103</link>
      <description>The Loss of Independence by Patrick J. Buchanan Posted: 07/04/2008 Not until a year after Lexington did the Continental Congress muster the resolve to declare the 13 colonies free and independent states, no longer subject to Parliament or Crown. Not for five years after July 4, 1776, did George Washington&amp;#39;s army truly attain America&amp;#39;s independence at Yorktown. &amp;nbsp; Even then, Washington and his aide Alexander Hamilton knew that the 13 states, while politically independent, were dependent upon Europe for the necessities of their national life. Without French ships and guns, French muskets and troops, the Americans could not have forced Gen. Cornwallis&amp;#39; surrender at Yorktown. Cornwallis would have sailed away, as Gen. Howe had from Boston. Indeed, absent the 1778 alliance with France, our Revolution would have been a longer bloodier affair and might not have succeeded. http://www.making-money-alert.com/off... target="_blank"&gt; At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, both Washington and Hamilton were determined to make America&amp;#39;s political independence permanent, and to begin to cut the umbilical cord to Europe. In the Constitution that came out of that convention, the states were prohibited from imposing any tariffs on the products of other states, thus creating the greatest common market in history, the United ...</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:36:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>(CM) theSuperPatriot</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/27257/The-Loss-of-Independence--by-Patrick-J.-Buchanan/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HELP STOP the Bailout of Irresponsible Wall Street Banks</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/24443/HELP-STOP-the-Bailout-of-Irresponsible-Wall-Street-Banks/?src=103</link>
      <description>Help Stop the Bailout of Irresponsible Wall Street Banks If you&amp;#39;re like the vast majority of homeowners, despite the recent downturn in the housing market, you&amp;#39;re not in foreclosure - in fact you&amp;#39;ve been making your mortgage payments on time.&amp;nbsp; Maybe you chose not to take out an adjustable rate mortgage or a home equity line on your house.&amp;nbsp; Maybe you&amp;#39;ve had to make sacrifices to cover your mortgage payments every month.&amp;nbsp; So, when you hear politicians talk about a &amp;quot;bailout&amp;quot; to help the Wall Street banks that issued irresponsible loans you&amp;#39;re asking yourself: &amp;quot;Who&amp;#39;s going to pay for that?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; The answer is: your tax dollars are going to pay for it. Don&amp;#39;t let that happen, sign our Petition now! The Senate has overwhelmingly passed a so-called &amp;quot;mortgage relief&amp;quot; bill that will set up a government slush fund to buy up these bad loans. This really should be called the &amp;quot;Rewarding Irresponsible Wall Street Banks &amp;quot; bill. Not only do you have to scrimp and save to pay off your own mortgage, but now Senator Chris Dodd and the rest of Congress want you to help underwrite other bad loans that should have never been made in the first place. ...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>nancy sivill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/24443/HELP-STOP-the-Bailout-of-Irresponsible-Wall-Street-Banks/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Criminal History of Congress</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26994/Criminal-History-of-Congress/?src=103</link>
      <description>The following was taken from the Libertarian Party website about 9 years ago.&amp;nbsp; I cannot find a link for it, but here&amp;#39;s the info anyway.&amp;nbsp; 29 have been accused of spousal abuse 7 have been arrested for fraud 19 have been accused of writing bad checks 117 have bankrupted at least 2 businesses 3 have been arrested for assault 71 cannot get a credit card because of bad credit 14 have been arrested on drug charges 8 have been arrested for shoplifting 21 were current defendants in lawsuits at the time this research was done in 1998 alone, 84 were stopped for drunk driving --- This is old info but I&amp;#39;m sure not much has changed.&amp;nbsp; Can you imagine a company of around 500 employees having this large a percentage engaged in these types of acts?&amp;nbsp; Yet, we keep electing them.&amp;nbsp; Go figure.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:50:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ConcernedMom</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26994/Criminal-History-of-Congress/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Despite promises, few in House make earmark requests public</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/14758/Despite-promises--few-in-House-make-earmark-requests-public/?src=103</link>
      <description>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/18/earmarks/index.html &amp;nbsp; Staffers for only 31 of the 435 members of the House contacted by CNN between Wednesday and Friday of last week supplied a list of their earmark requests for Fiscal Year 2008, which begins on October 1, or pointed callers to Web sites where those earmark requests were posted. Of the remainder, 68 declined to provide CNN with a list, and 329 either didn&amp;#39;t respond to requests or said they would get back to us, and didn&amp;#39;t. ( Find out how your representative responded ) &amp;nbsp; the stats are pretty bad for a congress that said they wanted to be more open!!!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Paul White</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/14758/Despite-promises--few-in-House-make-earmark-requests-public/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of Kerry, Maybe???</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26647/The-End-of-Kerry--Maybe---/?src=103</link>
      <description>Boston News, Massachusetts News, Weather &amp;amp; Sports Channel 7News WHDH-TV - The Hiller Instinct - Hiller Instinct: 7News / Suff... &amp;nbsp; Hiller Instinct: 7News / Suffolk University Poll -- Governor Patrick and Senator Kerry Reported by: Andy Hiller Producer: Mike Boudo Contact MBoudo@whdhcm View all archived The Hiller Instinct reports No one would confuse Deval Patrick with John Kerry, but they do have similarities. Both are lawyers with Ivy League degrees, both are liberals who like life&amp;#39;s luxuries, and both could lose their jobs. When John Kerry won his senate seat in 1984, the Celtics were winning an NBA title with the original Big Three, and at the State House, Governor Mike Dukakis wasn&amp;#39;t even thinking about the White House. Since then, Kerry has won three more terms in the Senate, but he hasn&amp;#39;t won the hearts of state voters. Our exclusive 7News Suffolk University Poll proves it: Just 38% of Bay State voters hope he&amp;#39;s re-elected in November, while 51%--more than half--want someone new. Nine per cent don&amp;#39;t know yet what they want. &amp;quot;These numbers signal vulnerability. In a perfect world, this would be a huge problem for John Kerry. The hook is, is there a candidate on the ...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Patsy</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26647/The-End-of-Kerry--Maybe---/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This week in congress--Bush Impeachment Resolution</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26683/This-week-in-congress--Bush-Impeachment-Resolution/?src=103</link>
      <description>&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I received this today from Congress.org--weekly newsletter. Kucinich Introduces Impeachment Resolution Ohio Representative and former Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich has introduced H.Res.1258 , a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Bush . Kucinich, who had previously offered a resolution calling for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney , offered a &amp;quot;privileged resolution&amp;quot;--one that must be taken up by the House within two days--containing 35 articles of impeachment, including: Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq Illegally Misspending Funds to Secretly Begin a War of Aggression Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War Imprisoning Children Creating Secret Laws Conspiracy to Violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001 &amp;nbsp; The Democratic leadership does not support the resolution, which is expected to be referred to the House Judiciary Committee and not be considered. Support the Kucinich Resolution Oppose the Kucinich Resolution</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>nancy sivill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26683/This-week-in-congress--Bush-Impeachment-Resolution/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another Kennedy coverup</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26645/Another-Kennedy-coverup/?src=103</link>
      <description>The surgery performed in this article reminds me of that performed on Ted--ie pt awake until functions impacted.&amp;nbsp; Good grief--was there nothing that they didn&amp;#39;t cover up??? http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/Rosemary_Kennedy/2008/06/17/105127.html &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>nancy sivill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26645/Another-Kennedy-coverup/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joe American</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26451/Joe-American/?src=103</link>
      <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPch2k63uj4 This video&amp;nbsp;offers some good ideas&amp;nbsp;towards&amp;nbsp;solutions for our country and the political constipation that now exist in our nation&amp;#39;s capitol.&amp;nbsp; I would make one change: It should be addressed to both houses of congress also.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:46:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>TeaDrowner</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/26451/Joe-American/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

