<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FireSociety - Ben Powell</title>
    <link>http://www.firesociety.com</link>
    <description>FireSociety - Ben Powell</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:20:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <webMaster>admin@firesociety.com</webMaster>
    <generator>FireSociety</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <title>Right of Privacy Threatened</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/23121/Right-of-Privacy-Threatened/?src=103</link>
      <description>Censorship &amp;amp; Federal Ban on Anonymous Posting Couch&amp;rsquo;s bill would require anyone contributing to a web site to file their real name, physical address and email address with the site. Your full name would be displayed with your comments.Fines for anonymous posting would be $500 for the first offense; That is the Real Clear Politics citation to a blog post I made last night. Rep Couch wants to make anonymous posting illegal, punished by a $1000 fine after the first offense. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; His excuse: &amp;#39;bullying&amp;#39;, an emotion charged bait which could slide this wedge of censorship through the Congress quickly &amp;amp; silently unless we put a stop to it now. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; My blog post begins with citations of the latest Iranian kvetching about Geert Wilders&amp;#39; film about Allah&amp;#39;s murder manual. &amp;nbsp; Read on to the&amp;nbsp; information about the proposed law. A link to the original article is included. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This issue is not receiving much attention, it only got 4 votes at RCP. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:20:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Powell</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/23121/Right-of-Privacy-Threatened/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fake Fatwa: False Condemnation of Terror</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/20105/Fake-Fatwa--False-Condemnation-of-Terror/?src=103</link>
      <description>On November 30, the Fiqh Council uttered and published a repetition of the lies they spewed two years earlier. Their lies were reinforced by a group of Christian &amp;#39;leaders&amp;#39; who evidently do not comprehend the concepts of al-Taqeyya &amp;amp; kitman. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; My latest blog post, Fatwa: Fiqh You , identifies and refutes the lies contained in the press release &amp;amp; fatwa, using relevant quotes from the Qur&amp;#39;an, Hadith &amp;amp; Fiqh.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The press is eating their lies like candy, accepting them without question. Muslims &amp;amp; Dhimmis will be&amp;nbsp; pointing to the fatwa, falsely claiming it as proof that terrorism is haram; that Islam outlaws attacks on innocent civilians. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We need to make a preemptive strike to expose the Fiqh Council&amp;#39;s deception tactics so that the fake fatwa will not be accepted as evidence of pacifism.&amp;nbsp; I am therefore urging bloggers to cross post or link to Fatwa: Fiqh You &amp;nbsp; and spread the word.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Powell</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/20105/Fake-Fatwa--False-Condemnation-of-Terror/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extortion Letter: A Common Word Between Us and You</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/18547/Extortion-Letter--A-Common-Word-Between-Us-and-You/?src=103</link>
      <description>The Ulama&amp;#39;s missive of 10\11\07,&amp;nbsp; promoted as an extended had of friendship, conceals a most venomous attack.&amp;nbsp; I have created a new blog: Go Burn With Muhammad to expose the letter&amp;#39;s true nature. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In the initial post, I dissect the call to common ground and the first quoted ayat: 3:64. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Before the Pope and Arch Bishops accept the bait, they should learn a few fatal facts: &amp;nbsp;According to Allah, Jesus Christ was neither crucified, dead nor resurrected. According to Muhammad, Jesus Christ is inferior to him. &amp;quot;If they turn back&amp;quot;, a prominent phrase in 3:64 is a prelude to military attack by Islam.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ibn Kathir&amp;#39;s Tafsir of 3:64 is used to clarify the issue and introduce another extortion letter and related ahadith to make things clear.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Powell</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/18547/Extortion-Letter--A-Common-Word-Between-Us-and-You/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constitutional Amendment Proposed</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/12697/Constitutional-Amendment-Proposed/?src=103</link>
      <description>Pedestrian Infidel has posted a proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution which would: declare that Islam is &amp;quot;not recognized in the United States as a religion&amp;quot; exclude Islam from first amendment protection prohibit the practice of Islam close Mosques &amp;amp; Madrassahs prohibit preaching of Islam &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; While imperfect, the proposal is good; it can form the skeleton of an effective amendment.&amp;nbsp; Please do what you can to increase awareness of the proposal. Lets start something!!! &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Powell</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/12697/Constitutional-Amendment-Proposed/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Such Entity Exists.</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/10223/No-Such-Entity-Exists./?src=103</link>
      <description>&amp;quot;Radical&amp;quot; implies excessive deviation from a fixed standard. Islam&amp;#39;s standard is set by Allah&amp;#39;s revelation, as recited by Muhammad &amp;amp; recorded in the Qur&amp;#39;an.&amp;nbsp; That standard includes, but is not limited to the following sacraments. Perpetual Jihad against Polytheists &amp;amp; Atheists. 8:39. &amp;quot;And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides All&amp;acirc;h) and the religion (worship) will all be for All&amp;acirc;h Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides All&amp;acirc;h), then certainly, All&amp;acirc;h is All-Seer of what they do. &amp;quot; Google 8:39 and read Yusuf Ali&amp;#39;s translation. Perpetual Jihad against Jews &amp;amp; Christians. 9:29. &amp;quot;Fight against those who (1) believe not in All&amp;acirc;h, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by All&amp;acirc;h and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Isl&amp;acirc;m) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.&amp;quot; Terrorism. 8:12 &amp;quot;...I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Genocide. 8:67. &amp;quot;It ...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Powell</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/10223/No-Such-Entity-Exists./?src=103</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

