<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FireSociety - modill</title>
    <link>http://www.firesociety.com</link>
    <description>FireSociety - modill</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <webMaster>admin@firesociety.com</webMaster>
    <generator>FireSociety</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <title>Should all US ammunition dipped in pigs blood before it's shipped to Iraq and Afghanistan?</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21536/Should-all-US-ammunition-dipped-in-pigs-blood-before-it-s-shipped-to-Iraq-and-Afghanistan-/?src=103</link>
      <description>This thought just occured to me while reading the post on &amp;quot;Three Little Pigs too offensive to muslims.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21502/Three-Little-Pigs--too-offensive---to-Muslims--that-is--/</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21536/Should-all-US-ammunition-dipped-in-pigs-blood-before-it-s-shipped-to-Iraq-and-Afghanistan-/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>White House Comment Line</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21466/White-House-Comment-Line/?src=103</link>
      <description>For anyone who would like to call the White House and leave a comment with the operators; 1-202-456-1111 I&amp;#39;ve been using this number for years and years.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21466/White-House-Comment-Line/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>True Conservatives do not have a new Leader!</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21402/True-Conservatives-do-not-have-a-new-Leader-/?src=103</link>
      <description>The only true conservative in this presidential race dropped out. Duncan Hunter.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21402/True-Conservatives-do-not-have-a-new-Leader-/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Obama learning the deep dark secret of the democratic party?</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21358/Is-Obama-learning-the-deep-dark-secret-of-the-democratic-party--/?src=103</link>
      <description>When this election cycle started I thought maybe this Obama guy really has a chance, although being a conservative I would never vote for him. This, out of nowhere rise of&amp;nbsp;a young, energetic, well spoken black man may be able to pull it off. After all&amp;nbsp;a lot of democrats have had a belly full of the Clintons or so I thought. But what I&amp;#39;ve been surprised to see is that racism is still very much alive in the democrat party. The republicans seem to find it interesting to watch the tit for tat exchange of blows back and forth&amp;nbsp;of Clinton and Obama&amp;nbsp;but the viciousness coming from the democrats on the ground about Obama is unsurpassed. It seems apparent that the Democrats want their votes but they don&amp;#39;t want to let them play. One is as liberal as the other. Anybody else notice this or am I living in a bubble? &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:28:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21358/Is-Obama-learning-the-deep-dark-secret-of-the-democratic-party--/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>666 Here it is ....the chip!</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21180/666-Here-it-is-....the-chip-/?src=103</link>
      <description>What&amp;#39;s wrong in Ohio Have all the Patriots left? &amp;nbsp; LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER Hospitals tagging babies with electronic chips Privacy advocates protest as half of Ohio birthing centers turn to tracking technology Posted: January 15, 2008 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi &amp;copy;&amp;nbsp;2008&amp;nbsp;WorldNetDaily.com Over half the birthing facilities in Ohio are being equipped with an RFID infant protection system placed on infants at birth to prevent them from being abducted from the hospital or from being given to the wrong mother. &amp;quot;Standard protocol in the hospitals using the VeriChip system is that the baby receives an RFID anklet at birth and the mother receives a matching wristband,&amp;quot; VeriChip spokeswoman Allison Tomek told WND. &amp;quot;The mothers are not asked.&amp;quot; VeriChip Corp., a publicly listed company headquartered in Delray Beach, Fla., is marketing though its wholly-owned subsidiary, Xmark, a HUGS brand tag-and-bracelet infant security system. The RFID tag is attached to an infant at birth by an ankle bracelet that is detected by monitors positioned throughout the hospital. Critics charge the VeriChip system is an intrusive technology solution to a problem that is rare. &amp;quot;The VeriChip infant security system is a technology looking for a solution,&amp;quot; said Katherine Albrecht, founder ...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21180/666-Here-it-is-....the-chip-/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will the Supreme Court void this election?</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21178/Will-the-Supreme-Court-void-this-election--/?src=103</link>
      <description>Liberal run states just do what they want and screw the constitution they don&amp;#39;t believe in any way. &amp;nbsp; YOUR GOVERNMENT AT WORK Electoral college bypass approved by 2nd state &amp;#39;Current way to elect president no longer serves America well&amp;#39; Posted: January 15, 2008 1:00 a.m. Eastern &amp;copy;&amp;nbsp;2008&amp;nbsp;WorldNetDaily.com A second state has approved a plan that would bypass the U.S. electoral college, giving the presidency to the winner of a national popular vote. The move came this weekend when New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine signed legislation that specifies the state&amp;#39;s 15 electoral college votes would go to the winner of the popular vote. Maryland, with its 10 electoral college votes, earlier approved a similar plan. Both are contingent on enough other states approving the plan to provide absolute control over presidential elections . Another state plan also is headed for the desk of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich after lawmakers approved it just days ago. Opponents say the plan threatens the nation&amp;#39;s republican form of government and would give unstoppable control over the White House to any coalition the major population centers would choose to create. It would allow New York City to outvote much of the Midwest; Los Angeles could ...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21178/Will-the-Supreme-Court-void-this-election--/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They don't want to hear from you.</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21117/They-don-t-want-to-hear-from-you./?src=103</link>
      <description>They don&amp;#39;t want to hear from you! Now what are we going to do.! &amp;nbsp; January 13, 2008 U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari for Landmark Right to Petition Case Constitutional Crisis Escalating&amp;nbsp; Coming: Appropriate Next Steps On January 4, 2008, the Judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, in conference, voted to deny the Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the landmark Right-to-Petition case We The People v. United States . On January 7 the Court issued its Order denying certiorari.&amp;nbsp; Without comment, the Supreme Court decided not to hear We The People v. United States , a case which, if heard, would have required the Court to declare -- for the first time history -- whether the Government is obligated to respond to proper Petitions by ordinary, private individuals for Redress of Grievances - specifically Grievances alleging unconstitutional behavior by the Government, and whether the individual having so Petitioned, has the Right to act to peacefully hold the Government accountable if the Government refuses to respond. In denying to hear this first impression case, the Court has ignored its duty to interpret the meaning of the Constitution, and leaves undisturbed the decision of the DC Court of ...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21117/They-don-t-want-to-hear-from-you./?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enemy within.</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21080/Enemy-within.-/?src=103</link>
      <description>&amp;nbsp; Enemy within. &amp;nbsp; http://noborderscamp.org/ &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21080/Enemy-within.-/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I voted for it before I voted against it.</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21067/I-voted-for-it-before-I-voted-against-it./?src=103</link>
      <description>Can a zebra change his stripes?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; From the NewsMax.com Staff For the story behind the story... Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:44 a.m. EDT Mitt Romney: My Abortion Views Have &amp;#39;Evolved&amp;#39; Abortion. Stem cell research. Emergency contraception. Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican from a liberal state who is flirting with a 2008 presidential bid, has begun carefully redefining his positions on these hot-button social issues. When he ran for governor in 2002, Romney pledged not to change the state&amp;#39;s abortion laws, despite his personal opposition. &amp;nbsp; But his veto Monday of an emergency contraceptives bill and his comments in recent months have fueled speculation among critics that Romney is hardening his opposition to abortion and other sensitive social issues to gain support from GOP conservatives. Romney says his anti-abortion views have &amp;quot;evolved and deepened&amp;quot; since he took office, colored in part by the debate over embryonic stem cell research. &amp;quot;In considering the issue of embryo cloning and embryo farming, I saw where the harsh logic of abortion can lead - to the view of innocent new life as nothing more than research material or a commodity to be exploited,&amp;quot; Romney wrote in an opinion piece in Tuesday&amp;#39;s Boston ...</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21067/I-voted-for-it-before-I-voted-against-it./?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If GunVoters don't get involved now, they will have little reason to get involved later.</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21046/If-GunVoters-don-t-get-involved-now--they-will-have-little-reason-to-get-involved-later./?src=103</link>
      <description>Written by Jeff Knox , on 12-06-2007 16:37 The Knox Report From the Firearms Coalition Candidates on Rights &amp;nbsp; By Jeff Knox &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (December 5, 2007) As the Primary season begins, now is the time for GunVoters to step up and make sure that they have a choice worth choosing come next November. &amp;nbsp; If GunVoters don&amp;rsquo;t stand up now, in the early Primaries, there will only be a choice between an anti-gun Democrat and an anti-gun Republican for President. &amp;nbsp; Here is an outline of the key candidates&amp;rsquo; positions. &amp;nbsp; Democrats: If you are voting in a Democratic Primary, there is only one candidate with a pro-gun record; New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. &amp;nbsp; Gov. Richardson had a good record as a Representative and as Governor. &amp;nbsp; All of the others have expressed strong anti-gun views. Republicans: If you are voting in a Republican Primary, things are a bit more complicated; here&amp;rsquo;s how they stack up. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Rudy Giuliani: &amp;quot;As a private citizen, as a prosecutor, as a Mayoral candidate and as Mayor, I have advocated for more regulated and more uniform gun licensing regulations, similar to those for a drivers license.&amp;rdquo; 1 While he has ...</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>modill</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/21046/If-GunVoters-don-t-get-involved-now--they-will-have-little-reason-to-get-involved-later./?src=103</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

