<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FireSociety - BryonNC</title>
    <link>http://www.firesociety.com</link>
    <description>FireSociety - BryonNC</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <webMaster>admin@firesociety.com</webMaster>
    <generator>FireSociety</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <title>Help Obama's Half-Brother</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/29604/Help-Obama-s-Half-Brother/?src=103</link>
      <description>Monday, September 08, 2008 &amp;nbsp;Help Obama&amp;#39;s Half-Brother Move Out of His Hut by Dinesh D&amp;#39;Souza &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The biggest scandal of the election campaign is going unreported, for the most part, by the mainstream newspapers and TV shows. Imagine if John McCain or Sarah Palin had a half-brother who was living in a hut. Imagine if McCain, a multimillionaire, did nothing to help the guy. Imagine if McCain came to the convention and spoke incessantly about compassion and how he was inspired by the biblical mandate: we are our brothers&amp;#39; keepers! This would be the lead story on the evening news. George Obama. Photo by Guy Calaf, Vanity Fair So why aren&amp;#39;t the networks covering the fact that Barack Obama&amp;#39;s half-brother George lives in a 6 by 10 foot hut in the slums of Kenya?&amp;nbsp; It took a reporter for the Italian edition of Vanity Fair to locate George Obama. Obama noted that when he met his famous half-brother in 2006 &amp;ldquo;we spoke for just a few minutes.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It was like meeting a complete stranger.&amp;rdquo; George Obama also told the magazine that &amp;ldquo;I live here on less than a dollar month,&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; and &amp;ldquo;if anyone says something about my surname, I say ...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>BryonNC</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/29604/Help-Obama-s-Half-Brother/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media ignores Obama concert negatives</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/25722/Media-ignores-Obama-concert-negatives/?src=103</link>
      <description>Media ignores Obama concert negatives Jeff Johnson - OneNewsNow - 5/22/2008 12:00:00 PM At least some members of the much-touted crowd of 75,000 people at a May 18 rally in Portland for Barack Obama may have been there, in part, to see a popular local band that normally opens its concerts with the national anthem -- of the former Soviet Union. National media outlets have widely reported estimates of between 72,000 and 75,000 people in attendance at Obama&amp;#39;s rally. What they have largely failed to report, however, is that many in the crowd may have attended as much for a free concert as to express their support for the Democratic frontrunner. &amp;quot;The rally drew 75,000 people, but the media did not give any credit to the opening act, The Decemberists, who are wildly popular in Portland,&amp;quot; says Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Media Institute of the Media Research Center. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m not saying that Obama wouldn&amp;#39;t have drawn a big crowd, but certainly when you have a band that popular opening for him on a beautiful day, that probably should have been mentioned [by the media]. &amp;quot; By not mentioning the band, Knight says, the media has been able ...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>BryonNC</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/25722/Media-ignores-Obama-concert-negatives/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gun Control's Twisted Outcome</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/12640/Gun-Control-s-Twisted-Outcome/?src=103</link>
      <description>www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html Gun Control&amp;#39;s Twisted Outcome Restricting firearms has helped make England more crime-ridden than the U.S. Joyce Lee Malcolm | November 2002 Print Edition On a June evening two years ago, Dan Rather made many stiff British upper lips quiver by reporting that England had a crime problem and that, apart from murder, &amp;quot;theirs is worse than ours.&amp;quot; The response was swift and sharp. &amp;quot;Have a Nice Daydream,&amp;quot; The Mirror, a London daily, shot back, reporting: &amp;quot;Britain reacted with fury and disbelief last night to claims by American newsmen that crime and violence are worse here than in the US.&amp;quot; But sandwiched between the article&amp;#39;s battery of official denials -- &amp;quot;totally misleading,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;a huge over-simplification,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;astounding and outrageous&amp;quot; -- and a compilation of lurid crimes from &amp;quot;the wild west culture on the other side of the Atlantic where every other car is carrying a gun,&amp;quot; The Mirror conceded that the CBS anchorman was correct. Except for murder and rape, it admitted, &amp;quot;Britain has overtaken the US for all major crimes.&amp;quot; In the two years since Dan Rather was so roundly rebuked, violence in England has gotten markedly worse. Over the course of a few days in the summer of 2001, ...</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>BryonNC</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/12640/Gun-Control-s-Twisted-Outcome/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All apologies,Mr. Franklin</title>
      <link>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/11357/All-apologies-Mr.-Franklin/?src=103</link>
      <description>HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 29, 2003 Sorry, Mr. Franklin, &amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re All Democrats Now&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Introduction At the close of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Benjamin Franklin told an inquisitive citizen that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention gave the people &amp;ldquo;a Republic, if you can keep it.&amp;rdquo; We should apologize to Mr. Franklin. It is obvious that the Republic is gone, for we are wallowing in a pure democracy against which the Founders had strongly warned. Madison, the father of the Constitution, could not have been more explicit in his fear and concern for democracies. &amp;ldquo;Democracies,&amp;rdquo; he said, &amp;ldquo;have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death.&amp;rdquo;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 04:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>BryonNC</author>
      <comments>http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/11357/All-apologies-Mr.-Franklin/?src=103</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

