Fla. Congressman said to be involved in 2nd affair
By BRIAN SKOLOFF (Associated Press Writer)
From Associated Press
October 15, 2008 7:53 AM EDT
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Hours after a married congressman addressed a report that he had an affair with a former aide and paid her to keep quiet about it, details of a purported tryst with a second woman surfaced.
Though Democratic U.S. Rep. Tim Mahoney did not directly mention allegations first reported by ABC News that he had been involved with the former aide, he issued a statement apologizing to his family but denying he'd done anything illegal.
Later Tuesday, a person close to his campaign told The Associated Press that Mahoney also was having an affair with a second woman around the same time.
Mahoney, 52, won his seat in 2006 while promising to return morals and family values to Washington in the aftermath of the resignation of former Republican U.S. Rep. Mark Foley. Foley stepped down when it was revealed he sent lurid Internet messages to male teenage pages who had worked on Capitol Hill. Foley was later cleared of criminal wrongdoing by state and federal authorities.
Mahoney's seat was already considered to be one of the more competitive House races, and he has been facing a tough challenge in a district that traditionally leans slightly Republican. He faces former Army officer Tom Rooney, a lawyer whose family owns the Pittsburgh Steelers.
During the news conference, before details of the second purported affair surfaced, Mahoney issued a statement taking "full responsibility for my actions and the pain I have caused my wife Terry and my daughter, Bailey."
"No marriage is perfect," Mahoney said, "but our private life is our private life."
He said he never misused campaign money and was confident he will be cleared of wrongdoing.
Mahoney's statement came one day after ABC News reported that he had an affair with an aide and then paid her $121,000 to keep her quiet and avoid a sexual harassment lawsuit. After the report, Mahoney called for an investigation into his own conduct by the House Ethics Committee. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also called for an inquiry.
ABC, citing unnamed current and former Mahoney staff members, said the congressman began his affair with Patricia Allen, 50, in 2006 while he was campaigning for Congress. Allen has not returned repeated telephone calls from The Associated Press.
On Tuesday night, a person close to the Mahoney campaign told the AP that Mahoney also was having a relationship with a high-ranking official in Martin County in his Florida district around the same time of the purported affair with Allen.
The person close to the campaign spoke only on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to openly discuss Mahoney's private life.
The person said Mahoney was having the relationship with the official in 2007 while he also was lobbying the Federal Emergency Management Agency for a $3.4 million reimbursement for Martin County for damage caused by hurricanes in 2004. FEMA approved the money late last year.
Mahoney's congressional staff declined to comment on this alleged tryst, but noted Mahoney lobbies for FEMA funding throughout his district, and that Martin County has received $43 million from FEMA since 2004. Mahoney didn't take office until 2006.
Meanwhile, a high-level Democratic operative who has been involved with the Mahoney campaign told the AP on Tuesday night that the FBI has begun reaching out to attorneys involved in the initial reported affair and accusations that he paid the woman to keep quiet. The person declined to be identified because of the FBI's involvement.
A telephone message left late Tuesday night on Mahoney's cell phone was not returned.
Republicans seized on the Allen scandal earlier in the day.
"We're pleased that an ethics investigation has been called for but quite frankly, we're not going to know the answers in three weeks unless Congressman Mahoney literally sits down ... and answers some questions," said Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee.
So, what have we got here. I warped old man who send kinky emails and IM's to young pages but there was never any sex involved, and if I recall, the pages were all over 18. Definitely over 16 which I believe is the age of consent in DC. On the other hand, we have a younger congressman, opposite party involved with adult women other than his wife where not only did (I assume) consentual sex take place, but public monies were used as hush funds. Is one better than the other? Is one worse than the other? I think they are both scummy, but the one thing I can say for Foley is at least he had the "decency" to resign immediately. As for the media....no big surprise. How did they word it, they didn't want to "get into the dirty details?" Hmmmmmm.
"A woman who demands further gun control legislation is like a chicken who roots for Colonel Sanders." Larry Elder
That is Media's Charge though to report on the facts and nothing less!!!
they can paint a picture of the events without Verbalizing words that are Banned by the FCC and can Blur out images of innocent people involved if there be any video discovered...
on a side note here is some information i found on the suppose'ed Fairness Doctrine
The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows or editorials.
Formally adopted as an FCC rule in 1949 and repealed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan’s pro-broadcaster FCC, the doctrine can be traced back to the early days of broadcast regulation.
Early on, legislators wrestled over competing visions of the future of radio: Should it be commercial or non-commercial? There was even a proposal by the U.S. Navy to control the new technology. The debate included early arguments about how to address the public interest, as well as fears about the awesome power conferred on a handful of licensees.
The legislation introduced by Reps. Pence and Walden, the Broadcaster Freedom Act (H.R. 2905), would prevent any future administration from reinstating “the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance.” It currently has an impressive 203 cosponsors, just shy of the 218 needed for the House Republican minority to demand a floor vote. All Republicans have attached their names to the bill; just one Democrat, Rep. John Yarmuth (KY), has so far issued support.