This is part of the reason why bacteria are resistant to antibiotics--help change it!

Forums Home | Domestic Fires | Big Government

Posts 1-1 of 1 | Latest Post
July 30, 2008 01:05 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 8, 2007

As we hear more and more about how infections  are becoming resistant to treatment with antibiotics and  diseases such as TB are not reponding to antibiotics, physician over-prescribing of antibiotics has been identified as the culprit.  But infusing our food supply with antibiotics certainly is a contributing factor.

Protect Our Health! Keep Antibiotics Working

Dear nancy,

Did you know that an estimated 70 percent of all antibiotics used in the United States are regularly added to the feed of livestock and poultry that are not sick-a practice with serious consequences for our health? Bacteria that are constantly exposed to antibiotics develop antibiotic resistance. This means that when humans get sick from resistant bacteria, the antibiotics prescribed by doctors don't work.

Right now, the Senate is set to renew a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) program that funds the review of new animal drug applications. We need your support to urge landmark Senate legislation that could finally stem antibiotic overuse in confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and preserve these precious drugs for future generations.

Please email your Senators today and tell them to pass a bill that includes provisions to protect human health and keep antibiotics working!

*If the links in this email do not work, copy and paste the following URL directly into your browser's address bar to take action online: http://ga3.org/campaign/KAW2



Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
Your Senators

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: Protect Our Health: Include strong antibiotics provisions in ADUFA

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

I am writing to urge you to include provisions in the Animal Drug User Fee Act (ADUFA) to protect human health and keep antibiotics working.

Currently, ADUFA provides fees from industry to fund the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to review applications for new animal drugs, but fails to take into account the effects of the continued use of these drugs--especially antibiotics--on human health.

Roughly 70 percent of antibiotics used in the United States each year are added to the feed and water of food animals that are not sick-a practice intended to promote faster growth and prevent diseases caused by overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions.
Scientists agree that this overuse of antibiotics is contributing to the rise of antibiotic-resistant human diseases, including food borne illness, systemic blood infections, and MRSA. Patients suffer through longer illnesses and higher medical costs, and doctors are left with a dwindling arsenal of drugs to fight disease.

Given the serious human health implications and enormous financial cost of antibiotic resistance, ADUFA should not be passed until Congress instructs the FDA to review the effect of antibiotics used in animal feed and water on resistance, collect data on how these drugs are used, and stop unnecessary uses of drugs that are found to cause antibiotic resistance.

Thank you for taking my concerns under consideration.

Sincerely,

nancy sivill

Take Action!

Instructions:
Click here to take action on this issue or choose the "Reply to Sender" option on your email program.


Tell-A-Friend:
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
 Tell-a-Friend!


What's At Stake:

Put Our Health Before Industry Profits!

According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, an estimated 70 percent of all antibiotics used in the United States are regularly added to the feed of livestock and poultry that are not sick. Bacteria that are constantly exposed to antibiotics develop antibiotic resistance. This means that when humans get sick from resistant bacteria, the antibiotics prescribed by doctors don't work.

Antibiotic resistance is becoming increasingly common, and scientists agree that the overuse of antibiotics in CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations) plays a big role. Today, new antibiotic-resistant diseases are being linked to CAFO practices, including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a disease responsible for over 18,000 deaths each year in the United States.

Why isn’t the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) putting an end to the use of these drugs in CAFOs for animals that are not even sick? Even if the FDA had the will to act, agency resources are tied up elsewhere. Applications by drug companies for new animal drugs are reviewed by the FDA in exchange for fees from industry. But this faulty “user fee” arrangement forces the FDA to be financially dependent on the very industry it is tasked with regulating, dictates the agency’s priorities, and forces the agency to adhere to strict deadlines for new drug approvals. As a consequence, other priorities, such as reviewing the effect of already approved antibiotics on human and animal health, are virtually ignored.

Congress is now considering the Animal Drug User Fee Act (ADUFA), a bill to continue this FDA fee program. A House committee already approved ADUFA with an important provision to collect data on antibiotics sold for use in animal agriculture, and this version of the bill is likely to be passed by the full House any day. This is an important first step. But it is up to the Senate to strengthen ADUFA to include provisions to direct the FDA to review currently approved animal antibiotics and to revoke approvals for unnecessary uses of these drugs that are found to cause human antibiotic resistance. These provisions are similar to those found in a bill UCS has long worked to pass—The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act.

Below is a letter sent by members of the Keep Antibiotics Working coalition to the Senate on ADUFA.


 

July 24, 2008

Dear Senator:

Re: Animal Drug User Fee Act (ADUFA) and Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA)

Antibiotic resistance is a growing threat. Antibiotics, the miracle drugs of the last century, are in danger of being lost as a result of overuse in both human and animal medicine. While both settings deserve urgent attention, food animal production is a relatively neglected area where enormous, often inappropriate, use of antibiotics is commonplace.

We, the undersigned members of Keep Antibiotics Working, write to urge that the reauthorization of the Animal Drug User Fee Act (ADUFA), along with its substantial incentives for approving new animal drugs, include provisions that will ensure public health and drug safety after the animal drug is on the market. Keep Antibiotics Working is a coalition of health, environmental, agricultural, animal welfare, and science organizations with more than 10 million supporters. The coalition is dedicated to the preservation of antibiotics for use in human and animal medicine.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization, antimicrobial resistance is the greatest public health risk we face. Antimicrobials (including antibiotics) are different from most other drugs in that resistance results from exposure and worsens over time. This means that in order to avoid the consequences of resistance-increasingly virulent diseases, higher medical costs, and increased suffering-the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must continue to address resistance after drugs are approved. Many antibiotics routinely used in animal agriculture were approved decades ago, before resistance concerns were even considered.

We urge that ADUFA, when it is passed, include provisions from Title 1 and Title 2 of the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA, S. 549) to address the ongoing resistance issues associated with approved antibiotics. The PAMTA provisions would:

1) Initiate the immediate review of existing antibiotics, in classes that are used both in human and animal medicine, of their safety for nontherapeutic purposes with regard to antibiotic resistance, and direct the FDA to take timely action on the basis of that review.

2) Require the collection of drug use data essential to the assessment and management of resistance risks associated with approved antibiotic drugs.

For both of these areas of post-market drug safety, the FDA must move quickly.

When the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was reauthorized as part of the FDA Amendments Act of 2007, it addressed post-market safety issues in human drugs. Similarly, any reauthorization of ADUFA should address post-market animal drug safety.

Over the past five years, FDA has consistently neglected the tasks necessary for the long-term management of resistance, as it has given priority to other goals funded by fees. Congress should not allow this failure to continue. Current funding now built into the agency's base, thanks to an earlier appropriation amendment, can be applied to the reviews required by Title 1 of PAMTA.

According to its mission statement, FDA is a consumer protection agency with a mandate to provide safe drugs. The most important aspect of safety when dealing with antibiotics is the evolution of resistant organisms. Congress should assist FDA in fulfilling its mission by assuring through the steps outlined above that antibiotics approved by the agency for nontherapeutic purposes, both in the past and in the future, are safe with regard to the evolution of resistance.

We urge you not to let ADUFA go forward without the vital public health provisions of PAMTA.

Sincerely,
 
Richard Wood
Executive Director
Keep Antibiotics Working

Learn more about the Keep Antibiotics Working coalition at: http://www.keepantibioticsworking.com

 


Campaign Expiration Date:
August 8, 2008

 

 

  


You must login to discuss this item.