Obama's Real Patriotism Problem

Forums Home | The FireWire | 2008 Election

Posts 1-5 of 5 | Latest Post
July 1, 2008 08:22 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007

 I think this article sums it up pretty well:

 

Obama's real patriotism problem

Tue Jul 1, 12:16 AM ET

 

By Jonah Goldberg

 

Barack Obama has a patriotism problem that even Monday's flag-waving trip to Independence, Mo., can't squelch. And it doesn't have anything to do with his lapel pin.

 

(Illustration by Suzy Parker, USA TODAY)

 

In part because liberal commentators have such a hard time grasping why patriotism should be an issue at all, and the GOP is so clumsy explaining why it's important, the debate often gets boiled down to symbols. Like so much else about Obama, his position on the lapel flag changes with the needs of the moment. After 9/11, he wore it. During the debates over the Iraq war, he stopped because he saw the flag as a sign of support for President Bush. (He started wearing it again in May.) "I decided I won't wear that pin on my chest," he added in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "Instead, I'm going to try to tell the American people what I believe will make this country great and, hopefully, that will be a testimony to my patriotism."

 

Read that line again: "What I believe will make this country great."

 

Not to sound too much like a Jewish mother, but some might respond, "What? It's not great now?"

 

This sense that America is in need of fixing in order to be a great country points to Obama's real patriotism problem. And it's not Obama's alone.

 

'Fundamentally good'

 

Definitions of patriotism proliferate, but in the American context patriotism must involve not only devotion to American texts (something that distinguishes our patriotism from European nationalism) but also an abiding belief in the inherent and enduring goodness of the American nation. We might need to change this or that policy or law, fix this or that problem, but at the end of the day the patriotic American believes that America is fundamentally good as it is.

 

It's the "good as it is" part that has vexed many on the left since at least the Progressive era. Marxists and other revolutionaries obviously don't believe entrepreneurial and religious America is good as it is. But even more mainstream figures have a problem distinguishing patriotic reform from reformation. Many progressives in the 1920s considered the American hinterlands a vast sea of yokels and boobs, incapable of grasping how much they needed what the activists were selling.

 

The Nation ran a famous series then called "These United States," in which smug emissaries from East Coast cities chronicled the "backward" attitudes of what today would be called fly-over country. One correspondent proclaimed that in "backwoods" New York (i.e. outside the Big Apple): "Resistance to change is their most sacred principle." If that was their attitude to New York, it shouldn't surprise that they felt even worse about the South. One author explained that Dixie needed nothing less than an invasion of liberal "missionaries" so that the "light of civilization" might finally be glimpsed down there. These authors simply assumed, writes intellectual historian Christopher Lasch, that " 'breaking with the past' was the precondition of cultural and political advance." Even today, writes Time's Joe Klein, "This is a chronic disease among Democrats, who tend to talk more about what's wrong with America than what's right."

 

Echoes of these attitudes can be found in Obama's now infamous explanation that "bitter" working-class rural voters won't embrace him because they "cling" to God, guns and bigotry. But Obama's sometimes messianic rhetoric about "remaking" America — and the explicitly revolutionary aesthetics of his campaign — also rings a bell. "I am absolutely certain," he proclaimed upon clinching the Democratic nomination, "that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal." So wait, America never provided care for the sick or good jobs for the jobless until St. Barack arrived? That doesn't sound like the country most Americans think of when they wave their flags on the Fourth of July.

 

Obama went on to say that he will "remake" the country. Well, what if you don't want it remade? And Michelle Obama — who believes America is "downright mean" and is proud of America for the first time because of her husband's success — insists that Barack will make you "work" for change and that he will "demand that you, too, be different." What if you don't want to work for Obama's change? What if you don't want to be "different"?

 

America's 'Jedi Knight'

 

Liberals might giggle at what to them sounds like paranoia. But if you aren't already entranced by Obama, Obamania can seem not only vaguely anti-American but also downright otherworldly. Star Wars creator George Lucas recently proclaimed that it's "reasonably obvious" Obama is a Jedi Knight. Mark Morford, a particularly loopy San Francisco Chronicle columnist, says Obama isn't really "one of us." Rather, he's a "Lightworker," the sort of being who can help us find "a new way of being on the planet." Self-help guru Deepak Chopra insists that an Obama victory would bring about "a quantum leap in American consciousness." Even NBC's Chris Matthews has been entranced by Obama's Jedi mind tricks. Obamania, he says, is "bigger than Kennedy. … This is the New Testament."

 

The notion that what America needs is a redeemer figure to "remake" America from scratch isn't necessarily unpatriotic. But for lots of Americans who like America the way it is, it's sometimes hard to tell when it isn't.

 

Jonah Goldberg, editor at large of National Review Online and author of Liberal Fascism, is a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors.




"Had the people, during the Revolution, had a suspicion of any attempt to war against Christianity, that Revolution would have been strangled in its cradle... In this age, there can be no substitute for Christianity... That was the religion of the founders of the republic and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendants." Charles Carrol, signer of Declaration of Independence, framer of the Bill of Rights, delegate to the Constitutional Convention, U.S. Senator
July 1, 2008 02:30 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 2, 2007
lets not for get this..

“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Obama and Palmer “were both there,” he said.


The Chicago Three: Obama, Ayers & Rezko

Obama's 'Weatherman' Connection

Obama was starting his political career -- making a visit to the Ayers home while running for a state Senate seat, and then agreeing to being on panels with him and serve on a foundation board together -- it was no big deal, or any deal, to any local political reporters or to the editorial boards of the Sun-Times or Tribune.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obama_seen_..._muslim_oversea.html

Obama's brother is a devout Muslim & other connections to Islam

When is Obama going to come out of the closet?

Gettin' Scary! Obama campaigned for Radical Muslim's overhrow of sovereign Democratic state!

Barack Obama's Connections to the Nation of Islam

Obama, Odinga & Kenyan Jihad

Barack Hussein Obama's cousin Odinga Obama is a Radical Muslim Terrorist in Kenya and he has close connection. Watch the REUTERS International report. Is this report another Barack Hussein Obama's TERRORIST links?


Obama's Hijab Women Connected to Radical Groups

His stepfather, who had a much greater impact on Obama's upbringing, was a radical Wahabbi Muslim.

Rashid Khalidi


  Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote
July 1, 2008 05:38 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 2, 2007
Current Article

Selective Service Required: Did Obama Register?

According to the Selective Service System, under the authority of the Military Selective Service Act (Act of June 24, 1948, c. 625, 62 Stat. 604, as amended; 50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.):

A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. Proof of registration is required only for men born after December 31, 1959.

The registration requirement was suspended in April 1975. It was resumed again in 1980 by President Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Registration continues today as a hedge against underestimating the number of servicemen needed in a future crisis.

1-103. Persons born in calendar year 1961 shall present themselves for registration on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980. (Source).

The obligation of a man to register is imposed by the Military Selective Service Act. The Act establishes and governs the operations of the Selective Service System.

Barack Obama, who states he was born in Aug. 1961, was required to register for the Selective Service in 1980. Did he?

Efforts to confirm his registration have been unsuccessful, and Sen. Obama has failed thus far to offer proof of registration, or authorize the SSS to release this information to the general public. It is in the public’s interest to know whether a potential president followed the law during his lifetime.

Sen. Obama can lay this issue to rest immediately by providing proof of his Selective Service registration, which is reqiured to serve in the Executive Branch. The President of the United States of America is the head of the Executive Branch of government. There has been plenty of obfuscation surrounding the matter of Sen. Obama’s birth certification. Hopefully the question of his Selective Service registration will be resolved more swiftly.

July 1, 2008 05:42 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 2, 2007

In my post Monday, Kos Tampering with Obama Birth Certificate?, I showed the results of my application of edge-enhancing software to two images of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth (COLB) published at different times by Kos on Daily Kos.

I didn’t see a seal on the old image; others claim they have, including the blogger Cannonfire, who calls out Kos for switching images without informing his readers. The blogger Polarik, it should be noted, is sticking to his story that they are all fake.

So maybe there was an embossed seal there all along. Maybe not. It’s insane that Americans have to download fancy software and get out magnifying glasses to verify the legitimacy of a presidential candidate’s birth because of his unwillingness to be transparent, but unfortunately that fits the pattern of this candidate.

Seal or no seal, there are many unresolved questions about Obama’s birth, and I’ll list those below, in as much an attempt to organize my thoughts as to share information. And I will continue to post developments in this story, but will also target other serious issues that have received less attention, particularly those related to Obama’s eligibility and qualifications to be POTUS.

If the birth certificate mystery has been used as a diversion tactic by Camp Obama, it won’t work with me. I have not forgotten about the missing state senate records, the dual citizenship sticking-point, the selective service registration, Larry Sinclair’s allegations, the Rezko crimes, and more.

I was asked yesterday what “alternate theory” I was putting forth about the birth certificate and I replied that it was not my responsibility to have a theory, that I was just presenting information and analyzing it to the best of my ability.

But actually I do have a working theory about the birth mystery. My theory is that there is a COLB on file in Hawaii for Obama [Update: this does not necessarily mean he was born in Hawaii!], but that his file, which would contain ALL of the information on his original birth certificate, includes information that Obama prefers to hide. I don’t know what that is, but I do know that it otherwise would be easy and painless for Obama to release the entire content of his file and lay this matter to rest. He’s chosen, instead, to share an altered image of a recently issued summary certification. Notably, the certification form used by Hawaii prior to 2001 provided much more detailed information about a registrant’s birth.

What is Obama hiding? It could be any number of things for any number of reasons: place or date of birth; parents’ marital status; name changes; father’s profession; father’s presence or absence thereof at birth; indication of dual citizenship; etc. Who knows. If/when Obama finally produces for inspection a verifiable COLB with seal, stamp, and everything else required to make it legitimate, I’m sure he’ll demand an end to all this questioning. But I personally will not be satisfied until his original birth certificate (or the contents thereof) is shown by the State of Hawaii.

Here are the key outstanding questions/comments I have about the birth mystery, and I’m sure sharp readers will add to the list:

1. If there is a physical COLB from Hawaii with an embossed seal, registrar’s stamp, and all the other required elements of an official COLB, why be so coy about showing it? Why not photograph both sides, show it to a group of reporters, and be done with it? Are we being played by Obama, or is there something fishy about the document? Which is it?

2. If the COLB lacks any of the elements (e.g., the registrar’s stamp), the Hawaii AG should investigate.

3. Why is Kos so involved? Why is he taking on the primary responsibility of documenting Obama’s legitimate COLB? When Kos, who calls himself a “journalist,” published the COLB on June 12 (just before the Obama campaign did) he made no mention of how, or in what form, he acquired Obama’s COLB. On a related note…

4. What has been the chain of custody of the actual COLB that purportedly has a physical embossed seal? Who has handled it, and when, in recent months?

5. What is the origin of the COLB templates posted on Kos by Opendna and how do they relate, if at all, to the COLB presented by Obama and Kos?

6. Why has Obama’s COLB been Photoshopped to death by the Obama campaign, Kos, or others?

7. Why is the reference number on the COLB concealed? The number has no relevance or connection to other confidential information; it’s just a file number issued by the State of Hawaii, the first four digits of which indicate the year of birth.

8. Why does Obama’s COLB say “date filed” in the lower left section when all of the other COLBs from Hawaii that I’ve seen, on the same form, say “date accepted?”

NOTE: Janice Okubo, Communications Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health Vital Records division (otherwise known as OHSM for Office of Health Status Monitoring) told me that the State used to use these terms interchangeably, but now “date filed is always used.” I did follow up with the AG to confirm this explanation but have not yet received a reply.

9. What hospital was Obama born in, and why won’t he clarify this information? I have seen references to two: Kapioloni Medical Center and Queens Medical Center. Why not release the records?

10. Why was Obama’s mother in Mercer Island with a 3-week-old for a brief visit in August 1961?

NOTE: A high-school acquaintance of Stanley Ann Dunham told me that Stanley Ann and baby Barry came through town alone in August 1961 on their way to see Barack Sr. at Harvard in Boston, and that Barack Sr. was not present at his son’s birth.

This explanation surprised me because supposedly Barack Sr. did not go to Boston until 1963, two years later. If the account is true, however, it would indicate that time lines provided by Obama about his family history are inaccurate. On this note, I was told by a reporter who investigated Stanley Ann Dunham that she enrolled briefly at the Univ. of Washington in Spring, 1962, and lived in Seattle alone with baby Barack. Perhaps they never lived together as a family.

I still think it is possible that Obama was born near Mercer Island because the stories just have too many holes.

11. Obama’s grandmother (Stanley Ann Dunham’s mother), Madelyn Dunham, is reportedly alive, lucid, and living in Honolulu near his sister. She is the person best able to clarify many of these questions but the campaign has not made her “available.” Why not?

Again, Obama should make his complete birth certificate file available, not just a summary certification.

#######
In the final analysis, a presidential candidate should not be mysterious. Barack Obama has consistently been secretive about all aspects of his life. We are a society that demands transparency from public officials, especially at high levels. It’s unacceptable for a serious presidential contender to resist requests for information about his family, college records, state senate business, birth circumstances, drug use, and any other component of his life that is relevant to the public’s determination of his fitness to be POTUS.

When you apply to be President of the United States, you forfeit much of your right to privacy. This is especially true for a candidate like Obama, whose unique history introduces complex considerations such as dual citizenship. Obama has the duty to be as transparent as possible, to satisfy the public’s interest that he meets every eligibility test, that he has been fully vetted for the highest office in the country. There is no room for circumvention when you want to be President.

TexasDarlin, all rights reserved.

July 2, 2008 09:38 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
martha501, those are questions that need attention as well.  Thanks for posting that.


"Had the people, during the Revolution, had a suspicion of any attempt to war against Christianity, that Revolution would have been strangled in its cradle... In this age, there can be no substitute for Christianity... That was the religion of the founders of the republic and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendants." Charles Carrol, signer of Declaration of Independence, framer of the Bill of Rights, delegate to the Constitutional Convention, U.S. Senator

You must login to discuss this item.