ACLU Attacks Midshipmen Daily Lunchtime Prayer

Forums Home | Domestic Fires | Other

Posts 1-7 of 7 | Latest Post
June 30, 2008 11:27 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
September 12, 2007
Comment updated June 30, 2008 11:28 AM

ACLU Attacks Midshipmen Prayer



The American Civil Liberties Union is threatening to file suit against the U.S. Naval Academy over the school’s daily lunchtime prayer.

Nine midshipmen at the academy asked the ACLU to petition the school to do away with the prayers, saying that some midshipmen have felt pressured to participate.

The ACLU sent a letter to the Annapolis, Md., school saying it was “long past time” for the academy to abolish the traditional prayer, contending it violates midshipmen’s freedom to practice religion as they see fit.

The Naval Academy rejected the ACLU’s request, saying in a statement: “The academy does not intend to change its practice of offering midshipmen an opportunity for prayer or devotional thought during noon meal announcements.”

Some form of prayer has been offered for midshipmen at meals since the school’s founding in 1845, and it is “consistent with other practices throughout the Navy,” according to the statement.

One recent academy graduate, an agnostic who objected to the chaplain-led prayer, said she felt pressured to participate in the prayer at lunch, where attendance is mandatory.

“Everybody else is participating with their heads bowed and their arms crossed,” she told The Washington Post.

“It became very obvious that you aren’t participating.”

She also said that midshipmen who want to pray at lunch “have the option to pray on their own. There’s no reason they should subject everybody … to this prayer.”

Another recent graduate, who is now an atheist, told The New York Times that whether officers make participating in the prayer voluntary or not, “they make it very clear that this is the standard, and the standard is Judaism or Christianity. I feel it’s inappropriate to have this in a public institution.”

If the ACLU proceeds with its lawsuit, it’s likely to base its case on a ruling by a federal appeals court, which in 2003 struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s mealtime prayer as unconstitutional.

The Naval Academy flap is not the only instance of religious practice creating controversy at a U.S. military academy.

Cadets and officers at West Point have told The Times that until recently, cadets who did not attend religious services during basic training were sometimes referred to as “heathens,” and they complained that mandatory banquets began with prayer.

Back in August 2005, the Air Force released new guidelines for religious tolerance that discourage public prayer at official functions.

The guidelines were drawn up after allegations that evangelical Christians wielded so much influence at the Air Force Academy in Colorado that anti-Semitism and other forms of religious harassment became pervasive.

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




"Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
June 30, 2008 11:31 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
December 2, 2007
That is appalling.  The ACLU has way too much power in this country.  They and NCLR both need to be completely abolished


For English, Press One.... For Spanish, MOVE BACK TO MEXICO, and Press Two!!!
June 30, 2008 11:37 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
September 12, 2007
Absolutely right, AMEN!


"Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
June 30, 2008 12:02 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007
They felt pressured to participate????  Say what????  These are the future Naval leaders and they are afraid to JUST SAY NO???  Or, if "mandatory", how does anyone know what they are saying or thinking during the silence?  They might be saying a prayer, they might be singing a song, they might be remembering a passed on loved one, they might be anticipating what a hot date, or what a great cold beer they're going to have tonight, hell, they might even be muttering to themselves what a bunch of BS this lowering heads crap is!!  Who knows?  Who cares?  Why the need to run crying to the ACLU???


"A woman who demands further gun control legislation is like a chicken who roots for Colonel Sanders." Larry Elder
June 30, 2008 12:07 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 5, 2007
The getting rid of the ACLU and LaRaza will come from we the people, we the people are letting them get away with it. It is now time for pitchforks and torches. We must use the same strongarm tactics that they use, only they have the government behind them and all the activist judges.


TEXAS: One of the few states that can secede from the Union.
June 30, 2008 03:40 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 12, 2007
Comment updated June 30, 2008 03:42 PM
It should be perfectly legal to beat an ACLU member with a baseball bat and drag them behind your car. Unfortunately it is not. They have a history that is as traitorous as any foreign army  approaching  your capitol. They have defended the "Man Boy Love Organization"- Child Molesters, They are currently defending the terrorists at GITMO. Can you say human crap with eyes? Money driven traitors all of them. Today in this nation money is God and nothing else. The athiests that drive this rotten org. are to me the anti-Christ. Even a poor Christian like me that rarely enters a church can recognize this clearly. Our nations epatath will be as simple as the" Emperor's New Clothes". It only took the child to tell the king he was naked. The rest of the politically correct weenies stood and watched it all happen. Just what we tthe people are doing right now.
June 30, 2008 08:35 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 10, 2007

This article also appeared in Military Weekly which I received this afternoon.  The editorial pretty much agreed with those Midshipmen who received a "Free Degree" courtesy of the American Tax Payer.  Ah, gratitude is wonderful.  Anyone who was asked if he or she is athiest, Christian, agnostic prior to entering a military academy would file a discrimination law suit against same academy.  Anymore you can't win for losing.


You must login to discuss this item.