Grassfire.org May 2008 Straw Poll

Forums Home | The FireWire | 2008 Election

Posts 1-20 of 161 | Latest Post

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last
May 9, 2008 11:15 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
January 24, 2007

Grassfire.org is conducting a Presidential Straw Poll to measure where grassroots conservatives stand  on a number of issues in the Spring of 2008. One of the key issues we are trying to measure is if grassroots conservatives are warming up to John McCain.

Take the poll here.

Please post your comments below.

 

May 9, 2008 11:53 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 22, 2007

Question #2 the most important thing to me in this election is National Sovereignty and this was not one of the options




GET CONGRESS ATTENTION! CHANGE YOUR W-4 AT WORK AND CLAIM 10 DEPENDENTS SO NO TAXES WILL BE TAKEN FROM YOUR PAYCHECK. WHEN THE MONEY STOPS COMING IN MAYBE THEY WILL REMEMBER THEY ARE SERVANTS TO WE THE PEOPLE.
May 10, 2008 06:52 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
Thank you for oppotunity.  What I don't understand is that, in light of last years poll, we are left with the McCain mess today.


2 Chronicles 7:14
May 12, 2008 07:35 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 12, 2008

I voted as I did because I will never vote for McCain,McCain is NOT a conservative by any stretch of the imagination.  Further more he is not the only Republican left in the race,although it appears Grassfire along with the rest of the establishment wish it were so.  McCain is an out and out one world,big government LIBERAL who would rather that the Constitution did not exist.  On June 2nd I will be casting my vote for Ron Paul,and should he not win the nomination,I will write him in,there is no way in he_ _ I will vote for John McCain.  McCain has voted against our freedom of speech,our 2nd Amendment rights,our national soveriegnty,and tax cuts,and that is just a start.

   Now let's look at Ron Paul's record.  He has NEVER voted to raise taxes,NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget,NEVER voted for a restriction on gun ownership,NEVER voted for a congressional pay raise,NEVER taken a government paid junket,NEVER voted to increase the power of the executive branch,NEVER been involved with the CFR,NEVER strayed from the Constitution,NEVER waffled on the issues,Ron Paul voted AGAINST the Patriot Act,AGAINST regulating the internet,AGAINST the Iraq war,he does NOT participate in the lucrative Congressional Pension Plan,he DOES return a portion of his annual Congressional office budget to the U.S. Treasury each year,he is known as Dr.No in congress because the answer is always "no" to the lobbyists who come with their pet projects if it does not square with the Constitution.  Dr. Ron Paul has delivered over 4,000 babies and has never seen a justifiable reason for an abortion.  He has been married to the same woman for 51 years,has 5 children,18 grandchildren,and 1 great grandchild.  And NO skeletons in his closet.

 

 

  Vote for Ron Paul and vote for liberty and the Constitution(which is there to preserve said liberty)!




When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads. -Ron Paul
May 12, 2008 10:20 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 14, 2008
If Juan McCain was running for office against Rasputin, I would vote for the latter. Hillary, or most probably Obama will win the presidency. It will take many years to clean up the mess either of them will leave in the Oval Office.
May 13, 2008 12:01 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
April 10, 2007
I know the liberal media have done an excellent job trying to deceive the public into believing that Ron Paul is no longer in the race.  But he IS IN THE RACE and he best represents true conservatives.  McCain and Bush are both neocons (liberals pretending to be conservatives).  My vote is for Ron Paul, even if I have to write it in.  No true conservative would have us at war with our planetary neighbors.  Nor would they promote a 100 more years of war like McCain has.  Ron Paul for President!!!
May 13, 2008 12:36 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 17, 2007
John McCain is a true liberal who just hapens to believe that the war on terror is in our naitions best interest, as do I. He is quick to lie, very willing to stab conservatives in the back and entirely willing to turn his back on our nations sovereignty!
May 13, 2008 03:02 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 13, 2008

 Question 2 and Question 3 are both missing what i feel is the single most important factor with this country today. The errosion of our civil liberties. I for one and growing very tired of reading about people dying from being tasered and police abuse. Not only that but these Fema camps and the growing threat of martial law in this copuntry. Until people start waking up and understanding qwere this country is headed polls like this are pretty much useless.

May 13, 2008 05:47 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
WreckingCrew said:

 Question 2 and Question 3 are both missing what i feel is the single most important factor with this country today. The errosion of our civil liberties. I for one and growing very tired of reading about people dying from being tasered and police abuse. Not only that but these Fema camps and the growing threat of martial law in this copuntry. Until people start waking up and understanding qwere this country is headed polls like this are pretty much useless.

 

Would you link us to your sources, please?

And welcome to FS. 




2 Chronicles 7:14
May 13, 2008 06:27 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 13, 2008

I don't really care whether McCain is a conservative or a liberal. I don't think labels are pertinent when there are so many issues that one can agree/disagree with individually. I do care, however, that he intends to pursue Global Warming. I'm not particularly enthusiastic about McCain, but what is our option? Ron Paul doesn't stand a chance and there is no one else.




May 13, 2008 06:35 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
mspSam said:

I don't really care whether McCain is a conservative or a liberal. I don't think labels are pertinent when there are so many issues that one can agree/disagree with individually. I do care, however, that he intends to pursue Global Warming. I'm not particularly enthusiastic about McCain, but what is our option? Ron Paul doesn't stand a chance and there is no one else.

 

Welcome, Sam, and this is exactly why we have McCain as the only Rep. choice remaining.  The sad past is that the Dems seem to be voting for who can beat McCain.  What a sad state of affairs if we vote for who can beat whom, instead of voting issues.

As to the Global Lie, they all bought into it.  It's hip and happening to think this way.




2 Chronicles 7:14
May 13, 2008 10:27 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
August 29, 2007
I agree with all of you regarding Juan McCain, but we must also think of the Supreme Court------these Judges are there for LIFE and can effect many policies ----can effect our way of life for a very long time. We know exactly the kind of Judges Hillary and Obama will put on the bench-----. If we do not take back the Senate and the House and if we have a Dem in the White House we are in SERIOUS trouble.
May 13, 2008 10:34 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
Sabrina R said: I agree with all of you regarding Juan McCain, but we must also think of the Supreme Court------these Judges are there for LIFE and can effect many policies ----can effect our way of life for a very long time. We know exactly the kind of Judges Hillary and Obama will put on the bench-----. If we do not take back the Senate and the House and if we have a Dem in the White House we are in SERIOUS trouble.

 

Yet, Juan McCain may just appoint someone sympathetic to illegals.




2 Chronicles 7:14
May 13, 2008 10:50 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
August 29, 2007
elaina said:
Sabrina R said: I agree with all of you regarding Juan McCain, but we must also think of the Supreme Court------these Judges are there for LIFE and can effect many policies ----can effect our way of life for a very long time. We know exactly the kind of Judges Hillary and Obama will put on the bench-----. If we do not take back the Senate and the House and if we have a Dem in the White House we are in SERIOUS trouble.

 

Yet, Juan McCain may just appoint someone sympathetic to illegals.

 

That is very true elaina, but we KNOW Hillary and Obama will appoint those who give the OK for gays to legally marry, abortion OK at 9 months pregnant, government controlled EVERYTHING!!!!!
May 13, 2008 10:57 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
Yet I'd rather scare America into a conservative Congress, that gamble with Juan.  I will not be controlled by the demands of illegals and their number one spokesperson. BTW, we need to get time limits on SCOTUS.


2 Chronicles 7:14
May 13, 2008 11:03 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
August 3, 2007

I am going to post this one last time--

Why in heaven's name does everyone think John McCain will select justices that are conservative?? Doesn't everyone know by now he is a member of CFR??? That fact has been posted by many people here on FS. He will select Justice candidates that are in agreement with the New World Order. They will be , perhaps, even worse than anyone Obama would select and the same ones that CFR member Hillary will select.

I am going to take hiatus from posting about this. It's going nowhere.

 

May 13, 2008 11:07 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 16, 2007
Comment updated May 13, 2008 11:11 AM

Wouldn't time limits just accelerate the rate at which poor judges are placed on the court?  It seems the justices that are "bad" were bad going in (e.g. Ginsberg) or went bad very soon after being appointed (Souter).  And I don't expect McCain to pick justices that are any better than Hillary or Obama would pick.  It is only an opinion, but I just don't trust McCain.  The only hope is to ensure enough conservative Senators with cojones remain in the senate who will be willing to prevent appointment of unacceptable judges.  I really don't want to see the good ones like Scalia get booted on account of some arbitrary age limit and get replaced by a Clinton/Obama/McCain appointee.

Mr Bill,

Well said, thank you!  I look forward to your return!




"There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: The bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen." -- Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) "In general, Democrats are the only real reason to vote for Republicans." -- Thomas Sowell FeedFwd: a born again coonass trapped in Austin, TX, USA
May 13, 2008 02:59 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 13, 2008

Mr. McCain has forgotten the conservative base that adds vitality to the otherwise limp Republican party. He expects conservative backing in the face of Mccain Feingold and the Gang of idiots 14. If there is one truth about McCain that sticks it is that he has donated his idiological and political backbone to the work of the democrat party. Particularly where the Global Warming hoax, illegal immigration, and dealing with democrat power brokering, that vice is dangerous for our nation.

The Democrats wont have him, and he wont have the republican conservative base. What can you harvest from a tree with no roots?  

May 13, 2008 03:01 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 13, 2008

Mr. McCain has forgotten the conservative base that adds vitality to the otherwise limp Republican party. He expects conservative backing in the face of Mccain Feingold and the Gang of idiots 14. If there is one truth about McCain that sticks it is that he has donated his idiological and political backbone to the work of the democrat party. Particularly where the Global Warming hoax, illegal immigration, and dealing with democrat power brokering, that vice is dangerous for our nation.

The Democrats wont have him, and he wont have the republican conservative base. What can you harvest from a tree with no roots?  

May 13, 2008 03:41 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
FeedFwd said:

Wouldn't time limits just accelerate the rate at which poor judges are placed on the court?  It seems the justices that are "bad" were bad going in (e.g. Ginsberg) or went bad very soon after being appointed (Souter).  And I don't expect McCain to pick justices that are any better than Hillary or Obama would pick.  It is only an opinion, but I just don't trust McCain.  The only hope is to ensure enough conservative Senators with cojones remain in the senate who will be willing to prevent appointment of unacceptable judges.  I really don't want to see the good ones like Scalia get booted on account of some arbitrary age limit and get replaced by a Clinton/Obama/McCain appointee.

Mr Bill,

Well said, thank you!  I look forward to your return!

 

Valid point. I just want Ginsberg and others like her out ,I guess.




2 Chronicles 7:14

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last

You must login to discuss this item.