Differences Between Conservatives & Liberals

Condensed Version of History For those who slept through World History 101...... here is a condensed version.

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter. The two most important events in all of history were: 1. The invention of beer, and 2. The invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer, and the beer to the man. These facts formed the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups: 1. Liberals 2. Conservatives. Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed. Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement. Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement. Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, the evolution of the Hollywood actor, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide all the meat and beer that conservatives provided. Over the years, Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass. Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of liberal women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat. Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living. Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing. Here ends today's lesson in world history....... It should be noted that a liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it. A conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers, and to more liberals...just to piss them off. Have a great day!

Some liberals, however, honestly think mankind is the scourge of the Earth and believe something like 2/3 of the world population should be eradicated.   I have honestly heard, more than once, them say something to the effect; “Just think how wonderful this world would be if there weren’t any humans on it.”  I say they can go first, in the effort.  That would, in deed, make the Earth a most wonderful place.  Throw another log on the fire, pass the beer and the ribs!

 "..something like 2/3 of the world population should be eradicated.."

Unfortunately that may be closer to the truth than is comfortable.

Home land Security wants to move the disease research center from Plum Island to the Mainland.

With stuff like this in the news I wonder what they are really planning?

“...a recent speech before the Texas Academy of Science in which Pianka endorsed airborne Ebola as an efficient means for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population. Pianka received an enthusiastic and prolonged standing ovation.”

<a href="http://www.ecoresources.com.au/ptv2/page8/files/may-2006.html">text</a>

<a href="http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2006/2006-04-07/feature1p/index.html">text</a>

I feel the possibility of a worker at a Biolab investigating Foot and Mouth disease or other eradicated disease might be a PETA investigator/saboteur is a great risk.

“In 2002, Hannah took a job in PETA’s investigations department....”

<a href="http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/kosher-spies/">text</a>

<a href="http://www.forward.com/articles/13264/">text</a>

To top it off the US Government says:

“The federal government and a private laboratory say they have no duty under Florida law to protect the public from anthrax or other lethal materials.”

<a href="http://www.wwsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=8276062">text</a>

“Doctors know some patients needing care won't get [it during] pandemic or other disaster. dilemma will be deciding who to let die....group of physicians has drafted a .. list of .. which patients wouldn't be treated...list was compiled by a task force whose members come from prestigious universities, medical groups, the military and government agencies. They include the Department of Homeland Security, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services.”

<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080505/ap_on_he_me/pandemic_rationing_care_3">text</a>

Anyone have plans for a biosecurity shelter???? I think I prefer a nuclear bomb, less painful.

There is also this from the talk in 2005 between Alex  Jones and Dan Estulin:

"...

DE: Oh exactly. I mean again this is all part of the globalist plan for the new world order because slavery is free and freedom costs a lot of money and it’s not free. One of the things that they did talk about at least mention in passing was one of the ways – what these people need to do as there’s not enough oil supply they need to begin eliminating world population and that brings to mind a 1974 report commissioned by Nixon the last couple of months of his—

AJ: Yeah written by Kissinger where they talk about ordering the third world to sterilize half there women or no IMF World Bank money--

DE: Exactly. On page nine of that report, I think the second or third last paragraph of the page they’re talking about eliminating three billion people in the world and 100 million American’s before the end of 2050.

I sure hope Dan Estulin is a kook but my worst nightmares say he is not. 

The IMF is THE FEDERAL RESERVE using OUR Income Taxes to "lend" our INCOME TAXES to whomever they so desire.  The U.S. Government doesn't get a single penny from any taxpayer.  It all goes directly and is owned by THE FEDERAL RESERVE.

They borrow some of it to the U.S. Government, at INTEREST.  Why are we paying INCOME TAXES to a PRIVATE CORPORATION that is thousands of time larger than Haliberton?  Why aren't we, even though it is Constitutionally illegal, paying taxes to our Own U.S. Government?

We have discussed in a number of places throughout this forum why Income Taxes are ONE HUNDERED PERCENT illegal because they are not apportioned as ordered BY The Constitution.  Are we a Nation of Laws or not?  Why and how can Government force us, a free people, to do things, like pay income taxes to a private company or even to the U.S. Government, when the law states that it is to be apportioned or not exist?

Before 1913, WHICH IS BEFORE TAXES, most individuals were gaining INDIVIDUAL wealth at a rate far beyond anytime since.  What would our live be like if we still had the same system, the system before The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which caused the Great Depression starting in 1933, and The Sixteeth Amendment which Secretary Flander Knox, the lying SOB, claimed was ratified and which was proved and found in court wasn't and which even if it was ratified The Supreme Court found in two cases that "it does not apply to anybody that was not taxable prior to it's passage."  If they didn't have the right to tax in 1898 and they didn't have the right to tax us after the 16th Amendment (which wasn't ratified any way) than they don't have the right to tax us now, unless it is apportioned per the Constitution of The United States of America.  Read it for yourself.

And while you are learning about the apportionment clause of The Constitution, check into the wealth that was amassed among INDIVIDUAL citizens before 1913.  YOU WILL BE SHOCKED at the wealth.   Our fellow INDIVIDUAL citizens didn't know what to do with all that money.  Oh yeh.  One more thing when you read about this.  Do you know how many things a SINGLE RED CENT would buy in the "GAY 1890s?   However...

A lot of that weath was controlled and manipulated by bankers and the so-called Robber Barrons.  It is true that they all started to gain massive control over the Government and certainly over base economics.  Some had the power to actually manipulate entire markets.   This resulted in boom and bust cycles.  They didn't have enough of the small business competition that we have today to keep these companies honest and from charging so much for a product.  Each of these guys had to be the biggest and the best and this resulted in panics and runs on the banks.  Here is what happened after that, which ended up with us losing our INDIVIDUAL wealth producing FREEDOM and getting taxed to death, by THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND their puppet the U.S. Govenment.  I find it interesting to note that the very people who caused all these manipulations that resulted in the problem are the same ones who attended Jekell Island and created the makings of THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and "The Matrix".

Early in 1907, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., in a speech to the New York Chamber of Commerce, warned that "unless we have a central bank with adequate control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its history."

By February 1908, confidence in the economy was restored.

In May 1908, Congress passed the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which established the National Monetary Commission to investigate the panic and to propose legislation to regulate banking.

A meeting at Jekyll Island in November 1910 may have hastened the creation of the Federal Reserve. Following the Panic of 1907, banking reform became a major issue in the United States. Senator Nelson Aldrich, (R-RI) the chairman of the National Monetary Commission, went to Europe for almost two years to study that continent's banking systems. Upon his return, he brought together many of the country's leading financiers to the Jekyll Island Club to discuss monetary policy and the banking system, an event which some say was the impetus for the creation of the Federal Reserve.

On the evening of November 22 1910, Sen. Aldrich and A.P. Andrews (Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Department), Paul Warburg (a naturalized German representing Kuhn, Loeb & Co.), Frank A. Vanderlip (president of the National City Bank of New York), Henry P. Davison (senior partner of J. P. Morgan Company), Charles D. Norton (president of the Morgan-dominated First National Bank of New York), and Benjamin Strong (representing J. P. Morgan), left Hoboken, New Jersey on a train in view of a group of confused reporters, who were wondering why these bankers, representing about one-sixth of the world's wealth, were gathering at this particular place and time and leaving together.

Forbes magazine founder Bertie Charles Forbes wrote several years later:

Picture a party of the nation’s greatest bankers stealing out of New York on a private railroad car under cover of darkness, stealthily riding hundred of miles South, embarking on a mysterious launch, sneaking onto an island deserted by all but a few servants, living there a full week under such rigid secrecy that the names of not one of them was once mentioned, lest the servants learn the identity and disclose to the world this strangest, most secret expedition in the history of American finance. I am not romancing; I am giving to the world, for the first time, the real story of how the famous Aldrich currency report, the foundation of our new currency system, was written... The utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car of which the railroad had received orders to draw up on an unfrequented platform. Off the party set. New York’s ubiquitous reporters had been foiled... Nelson (Aldrich) had confided to Henry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up at Jekyll Island, out of the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for the United States, the real birth of the present Federal Reserve System, the plan done on Jekyll Island in the conference with Paul, Frank and Henry... Warburg is the link that binds the Aldrich system and the present system together. He more than any one man has made the system possible as a working reality.^[1]

In 1913, the National Monetary Commission recommended the adoption of the Federal Reserve Act, which mandated the creation of a central banking system to dampen the effects of future panics.