Blackwater Training US Police_One Cause of Police Misconduct in the United States Today?

Forums Home | The FireWire | Breaking News

Posts 1-20 of 103 | Latest Post

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 Last
February 21, 2008 11:30 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 02:08 PM

Apparently, civilian police departments are sending their recruits to Blackwater for police training.

If they are, local officials should be pressured to reveal the numbers and identities of officers trained by Blackwater, the subjects covered by the training, the revenues spent, and a public demand should be made to cease and desist in such training.

Read the following on this issue:

 

Blackwater Training US Police
Wayne Madsen Report 10-15-7

http://www.rense.com/general78/blackw....

 

The mercenary firm Blackwater USA is well known for the controversy involving its "shoot first, ask no questions" policy in Iraq. It is also known that Louisiana's Department of Homeland Security contracted with Blackwater to provide public law enforcement services in New Orleans following hurricane Katrina.

Blackwater is also planning to establish regional training centers in Potrero, California and Mount Carroll, Illinois, billed as Blackwater West and Blackwater North, respectively.

These training centers, in addition to Blackwater's Lodge and Training Center in Moyock, North Carolina -- Blackwater East -- and a possible fourth rumored to be slated for the Pacific Northwest -- Blackwater Northwest -- may result in the establishment of a network of Blackwater-trained police, sheriffs, and other police units around the country.

Given Blackwater's dismal record on human rights and brutality, this spells trouble for civilian control of police and paramilitary forces in the United States, from major metropolitan areas to small rural towns.

On October 14, the Washington Post ran a story, which included photographs from Blackwater's Moyock training center. However, what was most intriguing was a photograph of a police and military patch board at Blackwater's headquarters that indicated the police agencies that have sent their officers to Moyock for training.

Blackwater is secretive about its non-federal, as well as its foreign clients, which the Post pointed out includes Jordan, Azerbaijan, and Burkina Faso, but a WMR inspection of the photograph of the police agencies has yielded the following list of agencies that have used Blackwater for training:

1. Iowa Department of Natural Resources

2. Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff's Department

3. Matthews, North Carolina Police

4. Atlanta Police

5. Chillicothe, Ohio Police

6. Charleston, South Carolina Police

7. Port Chester, NY Police

8. Highland, Indiana Police

9. Unalaska, Alaska Police

10. Metropolitan Washington, DC Police

11. Charlottesville, Virginia Police

12. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (Dulles and Reagan National Airports)

13. St. Louis County Police (Missouri)

14. Queen Anne's County, Maryland Police

15. Prince George's County, Maryland Police

16. FBI SWAT Team

17. Gloucester Township, New Jersey Police

18. Tempe, Arizona Police

19. New York Police Department

20. Yonkers, New York Police

21. Fairfax County, Virginia Police

22. Maplewood, New Jersey Police

23. Gastonia, North Carolina Police

24. Tampa Police

25. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

26. DeKalb County, Georgia Police

27. Arlington County, Virginia Police

28. Baltimore Police

29. U.S. Coast Guard

30. Suffolk, Virginia Police

31. Franklin City, Virginia Police

32. Milford, Delaware Police

33. University of Texas Police

34. Norfolk, Virginia Police

35. Ottawa-Carleton, Canada Police

36. San Bernardino County, California Sheriff

37. Plattsburgh, New York Police

38. Chicago Police Department

39. Oregon State Police

40. Los Angeles Police Department

41. Tonawanda, New York Police

42. Special Forces of Colombia

43. Jacksonville, North Carolina Police

44. Harvey Cedars, New Jersey Police

45. Elmira, New York Police

46. Department of Corrections, New Jersey

47. Lexington, Kentucky Police

48. Willimantic, Connecticut Police

49. Georgia Department of Law Enforcement

50. City of Fairfax, Virginia Police

51. Alexandria, Virginia Police Special Operations

52. Illinois State Police

53. Dallas, Texas Police

54. Hamilton, Ohio Police

55. Morganton, North Carolina Police


A number of the police departments that have been trained by Blackwater have abysmal civil rights and police brutality records, most notably the Chicago Police and Illinois State Police, both cited by former Illinois Governor George Ryan as being guilty of police misconduct in his decision to commute the death sentences of Illinois' death row inmates.

It was a decision that likely had much to do with his indictment by the Bush administration on corruption charges -- political misuse of the Department of Justice that has been seen in the indictments and investigations of Alabama former Democratic Governor Don Siegelman and HealthSouth former CEO Richard Scrushy, Qwest's former CEO Joseph Nacchio, Democratic campaign contributor Martha Stewart, Coastal Corporation's former Chairman and Democratic contributor Oscar Wyatt, and Democratic-leaning trial attorneys around the United States, as well as the firings of several U.S. Attorneys who refused to engage in political prosecutions, and a Justice Department workup on North Carolina presidential candidate John Edwards in 2004.

The training and potential political indoctrination of police officers by the extreme right-wing and proto-fascist Blackwater, coupled with the politicization of the Justice Department and U.S. courts, has the potential for the streets of Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Atlanta, New York, and Washington, DC, as well as Chillicothe, Harvey Cedars, and Elmira to turn as bloody as the streets of Baghdad and Fallujah.

Citizens have a distinct opportunity of confronting their local elected city, county, and town officials over Blackwater training of their police officers. Local officials should be pressured to reveal the numbers and identities of officers trained by Blackwater, the subjects covered by the training, the revenues spent, and a public demand should be made to cease and desist in such training.

Copyright 2005-2007 WayneMadsenReport.com

 

 

 

 




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 11:34 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 3, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 11:36 AM

Good, maybe they will actually be able to handle their jobs now....

I will definately encourage my local law enforcement agency to receive extra training from Blackwater....it would be a good thing- most are so incompetent.

The "problem" in Illinois is NOT a blackwater problem...it is the entire corrupt state of Illinois that has the problem. How irresponsible to blame EVERYTHING on Blackwater.




"I have wondered at times what the Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the US Congress." Ronald Reagan "Evil is powerless when the good are unafraid." Ronald Reagan
February 21, 2008 12:51 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
September 17, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 12:56 PM
Oh no problem...we want mercenary "soldier of fortune" types that don't have to salute anything American or anybody in the Military to train our WHOLE police system to be thugs like them. Yes, get all the city police lined up like Storm Troopers in black Darth Vader looking SWAT gear ready to pounce on the cattle and keep everyone in line during their insurrection drills and blood sampling checkpoints on the highways. Isn't it great how we're all plugged into a big surveillance grid and considered suspects until proven otherwise? Man that's protection...that's real freedom brought to you by our loving police who revere these same great paramilitary tacticians who took all the guns from the rich people's houses in New Orleans when they needed them most for self defense after Katrina. No warrants...just imposed martial law with obscure credentials and K-9s and their own BIGGER guns drawn. You know, the guys who the Pentagon hired to do some dirty work in Iraq and they ended up shooting a lot of innocent civilians and getting away with it? Man, there's that warm fuzzy feeling again...being watched and protected by cops trained by some really great mentors. Feelin' free and ready for the takeover when it comes. Yeah...this is all good for truth, justice, and the American way. Now don't worry, their tazers will just be on stun when they detain you for questioning...probably.


Return fairness and integrity to our voting system. The voice of Mainstream America must trumpet over the plutocratic oligarchy. ~ A Constitutional Republican
February 21, 2008 01:40 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 01:59 PM
(CM) BiotechBabe said:

Good, maybe they will actually be able to handle their jobs now...I will definately encourage my local law enforcement agency to receiveextra training from Blackwater....it would be a good thing- most are so incompetent.

The "problem" in Illinois is NOT a blackwater problem...it is the entire corrupt state of Illinois that has the problem. How irresponsible to blame EVERYTHING on Blackwater.

 

Paramilitary and private merecenary organziations have no business training or being involved in civilian police departments.

Local police are trained to enforce the law, and should also be trained to support the US constitution and not to violate our civil liberties. They generally have the best interests of their communities at heart.

Blackwater operates outside congressional control and our laws--so why would they care about civil liberties or our other rights?

If our local police are falling short in any way, the money being poured into PRIVATE organizations like Blackwater should be used for supporting the LOCAL police training under the overview of legititmate authorities that answer to the American citizens.

 

 

Blackwater has no business acting as a military force for our country, andmuch less in training civilian police forces or operating as a police force in the United States. We know they were hired to ‘protect’ New Orleans. They are starting out just like the German SS.

Blackwater and other private armies are immune from any legal system, funded by the taxpayers for the use of the elite, outside of any congressional controls….

The congressional House Intelligence Agency reported that it can not get any information on the amount of money being sent to Blackwater or similar mercenary organizations, but they estimate the amount of money is huge (on the order of 40 cents for every dollar spent on military operations!). This Agency reported that the total numbers of private military mercenaries that have been deployed or killed are not counted in our military losses and the committee can not find out.

 

See these videos by Jeremy Scahill for more information

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/scahill

Jeremy Scahill reports on the current US Government Administration's growing dependence on private security forces such as Blackwater USA and efforts in Congress to rein them in. This article is adapted from his new book, Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army (Nation Books).


Blackwater: Shadow Army

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqM4tKPDlR8&eurl=

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/scahill"

Our legitimate military should be funded and trained to fight legitimate wars, NOT private mercenary organizations such as Blackwater who operate in in military operations without any congressional oversight.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Being patriotic doesn't mean you have to be pro war."

 

 

 




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 01:58 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
I'd rather have a Blackwater trained Police Officer protect me than a whimpy liberal inviting all the crooks for coffee(or tea).


2 Chronicles 7:14
February 21, 2008 02:00 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 02:09 PM
elaina said: I'd rather have a Blackwater trained Police Officer protect me than a whimpy liberal inviting all the crooks for coffee(or tea).

 

But will they protect you as an American citizen-- or will they follow the orders of those who are paying them?

 

PS. Being a liberal or conservative has nothing to do with this issue.

 

It is a matter of whether these organizations are under any kind of congressional oversight and if there are ANY checks and balances, restrictions, or legitimate citizen control on what they are allowed to do!

 

It is well known that Blackwater and other private armies are immune from any legal system, although they are funded by the taxpayers; they are outside of any congressional controls.




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 02:08 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
I realize what the issue is, nevertheless the fact remains that I prefer a highly trained police force to stand up against lawbrakers.  All else to me is paranoia.  Hey, if I weren't that old, I'd sign up. 


2 Chronicles 7:14
February 21, 2008 02:15 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
elaina said: I realize what the issue is, nevertheless the fact remains that I prefer a highly trained police force to stand up against lawbrakers.  All else to me is paranoia.  Hey, if I weren't that old, I'd sign up. 

 

Police can be highly trained under legitimate procedures. This is the United States of America. One of the reasons we have maintained our freedoms and civil liberties for so long is in part because our military and our police have been kept seperate and have been under strict controls transparent to American citizens and their elected officials.

Private, military organzations have no valid reason for being part of our local police forces or even our military. They are not under any legitmate control. Doesn't that worry you at all?

 

 




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 02:18 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008
Nope.  I give them the benefit of a doubt.  Why:I know some of these highly trained individuals.


2 Chronicles 7:14
February 21, 2008 02:29 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 15, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 02:41 PM

Okay for those that would like to have Black-water cops -  have you seen this?  Maybe you would like this to happen to you or maybe your family members?  Looks like Black-water tactics to me!!!! 

 Got your papers?

This would only be the beginning!  Why do really think they want to have input into training U.S. police officers?  It isn't to move the illegal aliens out of this country!   Wake up people!!!!  America has always trained their own police officers and done quite well at it! 
How about this one?
February 21, 2008 02:45 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
elaina said: Nope.  I give them the benefit of a doubt.  Why:I know some of these highly trained individuals.

 

You keep missing the point.

I am NOT speaking of individuals. And I am NOT speaking on the quality of their military training.

 

I am objecting to a PRIVATE MILITARY organization such as Blackwater acting outside our laws involved in training my local police force.

Congress can't get much information about them and certainly does not control them....For all we know, they could be backed by terrorists. 

 

 

 




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 02:55 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
December 2, 2007
Lady Jane, I watched the video and I have to say, I totally do NOT get why you would consider this to be Black-Water tactics.  These officers have a duty to stop and/or investigate suspicious behavior.  I don't get what the lady's big problem was either, she just sounded like a big mouth whiner to me and if I was a cop, I would have checked out her suspicious behavior also.  If she would have had a better a better attitude and just cooperated with the officers she could have been on her way.  People need to learn that police officers have the right to do these things and is, in fact, part of their job.


For English, Press One.... For Spanish, MOVE BACK TO MEXICO, and Press Two!!!
February 21, 2008 03:22 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
 It is not just Blackwater that is acting outside the purview of the law and are given authrity to shoot to kill...read this at  
 
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/07/6918/
 

The FBI Deputizes Business

by Matthew Rothschild
 

Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does-and, at least on one occasion, before elected officials.

In return, they provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to “shoot to kill” in the event of martial law....

 

This business owner says he attended a small InfraGard meeting where agents of the FBI and Homeland Security discussed in astonishing detail what InfraGard members may be called upon to do.

These included, he says, the ability to travel in restricted areas and to get people out. But that’s not all.  “Then they said when-not if-martial law is declared, it was our responsibility to protect our portion of the infrastructure, and if we had to use deadly force to protect it, we couldn’t be prosecuted,” he says.

 A consultant for Alliant Energy in Madison, Wisconsin who is also an InfraGard member confirms  attending InfraGard meetings that went into the details about what kind of civil patrol function-including engaging in lethal force-that InfraGard members may be called upon to perform.

 




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 03:31 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 9, 2008

VEyes, thank you for the report.  I must ask though about the credibility of your source.  Don't forget all the truth reported by the NYT.

I guess we have to agree to disagree on this one. 




2 Chronicles 7:14
February 21, 2008 03:43 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
April 1, 2007
We have reached a new low when, we consent to mercenaries training our civil law enforcement. If this is true it's a new low for american civil liberties. I would compare it to United Nation Troops training american law enforcement.
February 21, 2008 03:49 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
Comment updated February 21, 2008 03:51 PM
Justine said: Lady Jane, I watched the video and I have to say, I totally do NOT get why you would consider this to be Black-Water tactics. These officers have a duty to stop and/or investigate suspicious behavior. I don't get what the lady's big problem was either, she just sounded like a big mouth whiner to me and if I was a cop, I would have checked out her suspicious behavior also. If she would have had a better a better attitude and just cooperated with the officers she could have been on her way. People need to learn that police officers have the right to do these things and is, in fact, part of their job.

Arbitrary check point stops of law-abiding citizens going peacefully about their busines, police asking for your papers...this is what goes on in a Police State and has everything to do with Blackwater since they are training our police to operate in this manner.

 

Fourth Ammendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses (car), papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

----------

"..Police have probable cause to make an arrest when "the facts and circumstances within their knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information" would lead a prudent person to believe that the arrested person had committed or was committing a crime. Probable cause to arrest must exist before the arrest is made: evidence discovered after the arrest may not be retroactively used to justify the arrest."

---------

The point is she was NOT doing anything suspicious. She had broken no laws and the police were not looking for any criminal that matched her descripiton. This was a arbitrary stop--there was no probable cause implicating her as a criminal. The fact that she was aware of her rights and called them on it does not make her criminal or suspicious.

She was exonorated at trial and did not even have to pay a fine. Looks like the police were in error.

However, it does appear that she was confrontational in the video, but I don't know what transpired before the beginning of the tape. I think she should have provided he ID, but I do not think she should have agreed to a search. There was no probable cause for the stop and it looks like the police were "fishing".

 

Traffic Stop Scenario Guidlines

http://www.flexyourrights.org/traffic_stop_scenario

 

In any given traffic stop, with a few notable exceptions, the below rules will help protect your civil rights and improve your chances of driving away safely—so you don't have to be a legal expert to say and do the right thing.

1) Keep Your Private Items Out of View
This is common sense: Always keep any private items that you don't want others to see out of sight. Legally speaking, police do not need a search warrant in order to confiscate any illegal items that are in plain view.

2) Be Courteous & Non-Confrontational
If you are pulled over, the first thing you should to do is turn your car off, turn the dome light on (if it's nighttime), roll down the window, and keep your hands on the steering wheel. Don't immediately reach into your glove compartment for your license and registration. Officers want to be able to see your hands for their own safety. Wait until the officer asks to see your paperwork before retrieving your documents.

The first thing you should say to the officer is, "Hello officer. Can you tell me why I am being pulled over?" The officer may give you a hard time or say, "Why do you think I pulled you over?" Tell the officer you don't know. Most importantly, do not apologize after you get stopped, because that can be considered an admission of guilt and could be used against you later in court.

Show your identification if it's requested. Be respectful and non-confrontational. Refer to the police as "Sir," "Ma'am," or "Officer." Remain calm and quiet while the officer is reviewing your documents. If the officer writes you a ticket, accept it quietly and never complain. Listen to any instruction on paying the fine or contesting the ticket, and drive away slowly.

3) Just Say "No" to Warrantless Searches
Warning: If a police officer asks your permission to search, you are under no obligation to consent. The only reason he's asking you is because he doesn't have enough evidence to search without your consent. If you consent to a search request you give up one of the most important constitutional rights you have—your Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

A majority of avoidable police searches occur because citizens naively waive their Fourth Amendment rights by consenting to warrantless searches. As a general rule, if a person consents to a warrantless search, the search automatically becomes reasonable and therefore legal. Consequently, whatever an officer finds during such a search can be used to convict the person.

Don't expect a police officer to tell you about your right not to consent. Police officers are not required by law to inform you of your rights before asking you to consent to a search. In addition, police officers are trained to use their authority to get people to consent to a search, and most people are predisposed to comply with any request a police officer makes. For example, the average motorist stopped by a police officer who asks them, "Would you mind if I search your vehicle, please?" will probably consent to the officer's search without realizing that they have every right to deny the officer's request.

If, for any reason you don't want the officer digging through your belongings, you should refuse to consent by saying something like, "Officer, I know you want to do your job, but I do not consent to any searches of my private property." If the officer still proceeds to search you and finds illegal contraband, your attorney can argue that the contraband was discovered through an illegal search and hence should be thrown out of court.

You should never hesitate to assert your constitutional rights. Just say "no!"

4) Determine if You Can Leave
You have the right to terminate an encounter with a police officer unless you are being detained under police custody or have been arrested. The general rule is that you don't have to answer any questions that the police ask you. This rule comes from the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects you against self-incrimination. If you cannot tell if you are allowed to leave, say to the officer, "I have to be on my way. Am I free to go?"

If the officer says "Yes," tell him to have a nice day, and leave immediately. If the officer's answer is ambiguous, or if he asks you another unrelated question, persist by asking "am I being detained, or can I go now?" If the officer says "No," you are being detained, and you may be placed under arrest. If this is the case, reassert your rights as outlined above, and follow Rules #5 and #6.

5) Do Not Answer Questions without Your Attorney Present
There is no reason to worry that your failure to answer the officer's questions will later be used against you. The truth is just the opposite: Anything you say can, and probably will, be used against you.

In just about any case imaginable, a person is best off not answering any questions about his involvement in anything illegal. Assert your Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by saying these exact words: "Officer, I have nothing to say until I speak with a lawyer."

*Remember- If you do choose to answer any of the officer's questions, always be honest. Police are not easily tricked and will often become hostile if they feel disrespected. If you feel it is best not to answer truthfully, then don't say anything at all.

6) Do Not Physically Resist
If the police proceed to detain, search, or arrest you despite your wishes—do not physically resist. You may state clearly but non-confrontationally: "Officer, I am not resisting arrest and I do not consent to any searches." Or you may assert your rights by simply saying nothing until you can speak with an attorney.

 

 

She was exorated at trial and realeased without even a fine! .




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 03:51 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 15, 2007
Justine said: Lady Jane, I watched the video and I have to say, I totally do NOT get why you would consider this to be Black-Water tactics.  These officers have a duty to stop and/or investigate suspicious behavior.  I don't get what the lady's big problem was either, she just sounded like a big mouth whiner to me and if I was a cop, I would have checked out her suspicious behavior also.  If she would have had a better a better attitude and just cooperated with the officers she could have been on her way.  People need to learn that police officers have the right to do these things and is, in fact, part of their job.

 

The point is they had no reason to stop her or to ask for papers!  Wake up! This is America!  NOR did they have a reason to arrest her!  What does it take to open people's eyes?  Don't you know anything about the Constitution?   This is more about coming events then anything else!  It has gotten to the point that these cops don't know their own rights according to the Constitution,  let alone the U.S. citizens rights.

 

 

 

If that one doesn't open your eyes how about this one where they had no right to arrest this women!  She calls for help and instead of help she is thrown into jail!  This is happening all over the place. 

 

 http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=53707&bw=

 

February 21, 2008 03:53 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007
I'd take ANYTHING Wayne Madsen says with a grain of salt.  He's the idiot who wrote the pack of BS about the Pope supposedly saying Bush was the antichrist.  As is his style, once again he doesn't/can't name a single person.  Everything with him is always "a source close to", "a staff member said", "an unidentified person said".  What a crock.  This also sounds very similar to the "reports" last year of unidentified "soldiers" running around in North or South Carolina in black uniforms, etc.


"A woman who demands further gun control legislation is like a chicken who roots for Colonel Sanders." Larry Elder
February 21, 2008 04:01 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
elaina said:

VEyes, thank you for the report.  I must ask though about the credibility of your source.  Don't forget all the truth reported by the NYT.

I guess we have to agree to disagree on this one. 

 

I don't look at just one source, but quoted this one source as representative of what I know from many other sources ie from informed opinion.

I am speaking from principles, and my principles are not determined by what I read on an Internet site--I  stand for individual freedom and protecting our civil liberties. I also believe in a good, strong police force  and military to protect me when those freedoms are at risk. At the same time, these must be legal instutitions with some control and oversight by citizens.

 I don't belive private organizations who are paid by others with vested interests will care much about our civil liberities.

 We can agree to disagree--but that won't help much when they come to break down our doors--then there won't be anything we can do about it.




VEYES2
February 21, 2008 04:02 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 7, 2007
Lady Jane said:
Justine said: Lady Jane, I watched the video and I have to say, I totally do NOT get why you would consider this to be Black-Water tactics.  These officers have a duty to stop and/or investigate suspicious behavior.  I don't get what the lady's big problem was either, she just sounded like a big mouth whiner to me and if I was a cop, I would have checked out her suspicious behavior also.  If she would have had a better a better attitude and just cooperated with the officers she could have been on her way.  People need to learn that police officers have the right to do these things and is, in fact, part of their job.

 

The point is they had no reason to stop her or to ask for papers!  Wake up! This is America!  NOR did they have a reason to arrest her!  What does it take to open people's eyes?  Don't you know anything about the Constitution?   This is more about coming events then anything else!  It has gotten to the point that these cops don't know their own rights according to the Constitution,  let alone the U.S. citizens rights.

 

If that one doesn't open your eyes how about this one where they had no right to arrest this women!  She calls for help and instead of help she is thrown into jail!  This is happening all over the place. 

 

 http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=53707&bw=

 

 

 




VEYES2

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 Last

You must login to discuss this item.