Can you remove a politician form office?

Forums Home | Border Fires | Where Senators stand on Amnesty

Posts 1-20 of 35 | Latest Post

First 1 2 Last
November 30, 2007 04:43 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Comment updated November 30, 2007 04:44 PM
I have been around for a while and have seen a lot of things. I love my country and served it well. What is happening in America today is despicable and I have great concern that America and our way of life is in danger. The total disrespect by politicians to Americans leaves me angered. I asked myself could we remove a politician from office and started looking for the answer and much to my surprise the only recourse I found was described in the preamble to the declaration of independence.  
Time will not permit us to vote the mess in Washington out of office before we lose this country. We can't sue a judge or remove a senator , governor or president except by recall, petition or a vote, attempting to do this the politically correct way would it be grueling and impossible as history has shown.
As a matter of fact Americans have no control over higher ranking politicians at state , county or federal level. Politicians have been building a fence around themselves for years as well as judges. Below is the only alternative Americans have. We are in serious trouble unless steps are taken to gain back control of our government. I have researched various ways to accomplish this but in reality the only way that I could find is described below.  

The preamble to the declaration of independence says.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. (Note: the original hand-written text ended on the phrase "the pursuit of property" rather than "the pursuit of Happiness" but the phrase was changed in subsequent copies in part because it was broader. The latter phrase is used today).

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

In political philosophy, the right to revolution (or "right of rebellion") is a right articulated first by the Monarchomachs in the context of the French Wars of Religion, by Huguenots thinkers who legitimated tyrannicides. It was then taken up by John Locke in Two Treatises of Government as part of his social contract theory. Locke declared that under natural law, all people have the right to life, liberty, and estate; he wrote that under the social contract, the people could instigate a revolution against the government when it acted against the interests of citizens and replace the government with another government in the interests of the citizens. The right of revolution thus essentially acted as a safeguard against tyranny. This is a concept similar to the right of rebellion exercised by Polish szlachta.

November 30, 2007 04:49 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 5, 2007

I'd like a nickle for every time this question has been asked on this forum.

           Election Day 




"Good fences make good neighbors."-Robert Frost "Too BAD!!"-Glenn Beck
November 30, 2007 04:58 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Have you had someone answer it?
November 30, 2007 05:06 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007
FEDUP said: Have you had someone answer it?

 

Yes, but not sure where.  There is NO national recall capability - period.  All recall potential depends on the laws of each state.  There was a thread with more detail, but I know in Texas we can only use the ballot box to make changes - no recall provision for federal (Congress)!


TEXAN...NO - I WON'T FORGET THE ALAMO! "Where's the Fence???" RINO huntin' season started January 10th (but ended January 22nd)! FRED has left the building!!!! MITT has entered my world! Oops, MITT left my world too soon also (on February 7th)! Dang, can't catch a break -- but Hillary, Obama, and McCain aren't it either (nor Huckabee, Paul, Keyes, Nader, ad nauseum)!
November 30, 2007 05:35 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 27, 2007

You are certainly correct that we have the right to take any action necessary to correct a government that has strayed too far from its mandate.  The problem is what is the defining point.  That pretty much has to be something that is agreed upon by an overwhelming  majority of the populous, as alluded to in the preamble.

It is also a certainty that the Department of Homeland Security would be what would be used to squelch any popular uprising, which would normally take place at the ballot box.  Given that we, as taxpayers, have granted the government a blank check to secure us from foreign (and domestic) subversion with military hardware, such an undertaking would have to insure success by intimidating those in governance with a return to their mandate if Constitutional safeguards had become too compromised.

Probably the best strategy is to keep "hitting" the politicians with our gripes, wearing them down with our constant complaints on their intransigence, until we cannot be ignored by even the mainstream media.  It is suprisingly pleasant to see that the Republican candidates are receiving hard hitting questions on illegal immigration.  Romney (and his illegal alien mansion) and Guiliani's exchange (about his having a sanctuary city in New York) needs to be repeated more often in the months ahead.

As far as the Democrats are concerned, they are managing to control any and all discussion on their political debate circuits by disallowing the illegal immigration issue to be discussed.  Those who are adept at infiltrating these debates need to get some "plants" into their debate circuit.  It would be more than interesting to see Hillary Clinton in "melt-down" over some of those planted questions.




We don't need new "comprehensive" immigration laws. We need widespread, well funded enforcement of existing immigration law, i. e. IRCA 1986. http://www.oig.lsc.gov/legis/irca86.htm ANYTHING ELSE IS JUST A BIG CHARADE! Remember the Alamo AND Agents Compean, Ramos, Brugman, Sipe, Rhodes, Deputy Sheriff Hernandez, K-9 Officer Mohr & Noe Aleman. ***Redress it all by repealing the 17th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution: http://www.articlev.com/repeal_the_17...
November 30, 2007 05:54 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Jim from Texas said:
FEDUP said: Have you had someone answer it?

 

Yes, but not sure where.  There is NO national recall capability - period.  All recall potential depends on the laws of each state.  There was a thread with more detail, but I know in Texas we can only use the ballot box to make changes - no recall provision for federal (Congress)!

 

Yes I agree with you on that. It just really supprised me that we are not in control of our politicians other than voting them into office. This goes for state federal and county officals. 
November 30, 2007 06:00 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Employers, Employers... said:

You are certainly correct that we have the right to take any action necessary to correct a government that has strayed too far from its mandate.  The problem is what is the defining point.  That pretty much has to be something that is agreed upon by an overwhelming  majority of the populous, as alluded to in the preamble.

It is also a certainty that the Department of Homeland Security would be what would be used to squelch any popular uprising, which would normally take place at the ballot box.  Given that we, as taxpayers, have granted the government a blank check to secure us from foreign (and domestic) subversion with military hardware, such an undertaking would have to insure success by intimidating those in governance with a return to their mandate if Constitutional safeguards had become too compromised.

Probably the best strategy is to keep "hitting" the politicians with our gripes, wearing them down with our constant complaints on their intransigence, until we cannot be ignored by even the mainstream media.  It is suprisingly pleasant to see that the Republican candidates are receiving hard hitting questions on illegal immigration.  Romney (and his illegal alien mansion) and Guiliani's exchange (about his having a sanctuary city in New York) needs to be repeated more often in the months ahead.

As far as the Democrats are concerned, they are managing to control any and all discussion on their political debate circuits by disallowing the illegal immigration issue to be discussed.  Those who are adept at infiltrating these debates need to get some "plants" into their debate circuit.  It would be more than interesting to see Hillary Clinton in "melt-down" over some of those planted questions.

 

Thank you for your feedback. I have and continue to notice an up surge in the population and there interest in politics as well as the anger level. My feelings are that the majority of Americans feel the same way. Organizing them will be a job but it can be acomplished. It would send the right message. We really do need to clean out the house.
November 30, 2007 06:07 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 27, 2007
FEDUP said:
Jim from Texas said:
FEDUP said: Have you had someone answer it?

 

Yes, but not sure where.  There is NO national recall capability - period.  All recall potential depends on the laws of each state.  There was a thread with more detail, but I know in Texas we can only use the ballot box to make changes - no recall provision for federal (Congress)!

 

Yes I agree with you on that. It just really supprised me that we are not in control of our politicians other than voting them into office. This goes for state federal and county officals. 

 

We lost control of the Federal recall process when the 17th Amendment was passed in 1912.  As you can see, there is a long term plan to reduce the power of We the People.  You obviously aren't aware of this piece of history, as are most others.  That is how the forces that oppose liberty work, over the long haul.

The following links describe how the 17th changed the removal process of U. S. Senators:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

http://www.firesociety.com/forum/thread/15006/Repeal-the-17th-amendment/




We don't need new "comprehensive" immigration laws. We need widespread, well funded enforcement of existing immigration law, i. e. IRCA 1986. http://www.oig.lsc.gov/legis/irca86.htm ANYTHING ELSE IS JUST A BIG CHARADE! Remember the Alamo AND Agents Compean, Ramos, Brugman, Sipe, Rhodes, Deputy Sheriff Hernandez, K-9 Officer Mohr & Noe Aleman. ***Redress it all by repealing the 17th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution: http://www.articlev.com/repeal_the_17...
November 30, 2007 06:48 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Again thank you for your feedback. I neglected politics for a long time. I just know I don't like them today and was surprised at the lack of control we Americans have over our politicians. I don't think a lot of Americans realize this and is the reason I am attempting to bring it to the forefront. It is something that needs to be changed.
December 22, 2007 10:22 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 22, 2007

Recall legislation is written into the State Constitution of 18 states, and some more limited than others.

http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/elect/recallprovision.htm

 

google "states with recall legislation" for more links.




GET CONGRESS ATTENTION! CHANGE YOUR W-4 AT WORK AND CLAIM 10 DEPENDENTS SO NO TAXES WILL BE TAKEN FROM YOUR PAYCHECK. WHEN THE MONEY STOPS COMING IN MAYBE THEY WILL REMEMBER THEY ARE SERVANTS TO WE THE PEOPLE.
December 24, 2007 10:34 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
msbobbie said:

Recall legislation is written into the State Constitution of 18 states, and some more limited than others.

http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/elect/recallprovision.htm

 

google "states with recall legislation" for more links.

 

Thanks for the link. I have browsed through it. Its interesting that the bad boys and girls have access to such a wide variety of resources all at tax payers expense. In other words if you get into trouble don't worry we will help you get out of it.
December 24, 2007 11:01 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 27, 2007

Another option you can petition courts to file charges against member of Congress in all 50 states for treason, conspiracy, embezzlement, perjury, fraud etc. Bush and Cheney have been arrested.

December 24, 2007 11:23 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Comment updated December 24, 2007 12:58 PM
Bugbaggers said:

Another option you can petition courts to file charges against member of Congress in all 50 states for treason, conspiracy, embezzlement, perjury, fraud etc. Bush and Cheney have been arrested.

Thank you for the feedback. It would be a great idea if our judicial system wasn't as corrupt as it is. From what I see and read In order to get the medias attention we will need an unorthodox approached in other words something that has not been tried before. If you come across additional information please let me know

December 24, 2007 11:26 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 19, 2007
Bugbaggers said:

Another option you can petition courts to file charges against member of Congress in all 50 states for treason, conspiracy, embezzlement, perjury, fraud etc. Bush and Cheney have been arrested.

The only way that would be possible is to find the type judges that were involved with the Arizona law. Which I am sure are far and few between!


December 24, 2007 11:57 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
December 6, 2007
Bush now has installed within the presidency, the power to call in NATO and UN troops to quell domestic civil unrest, declaring himself dictator and removing all power from the courts and congress. If his power is threatened, he undoubtedly will use such power, cloaked in the GWOT, and claiming it is his mission from God and his patriotic duty to secure the country against domestic enemies. The MSM will tout his great wisdom and patriotism, declaring him the people's hero. The true patriots will lay in unmarked mass graves or languishing in prisons without habeas corpus. Basically, he would not hesitate to declare war on America.


"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Sam Adams, terrorist and patriot, public enemy #1 OUR GRAVEST and most imminent threat is the U.S. Government and it's allies, Socialist Media and big business. I am a dedicated revolutionary. Oh yeah! Screw Hitlery and her minions.
December 24, 2007 12:27 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 27, 2007

Normally the Secret Service arrests anyone delivering legal dicuments to the White House, for fear of arrest of the president, who has already been arrested 5 times before, with at least 3 criminal convictions, plus Cheney’s 2 convictions.

Congress would probably be a bit easier. Especially when in home districts.  Pelosi-CA, Conyer MI and Hoyer MD would be good targets for obstructing justice among other things.

 

 

December 24, 2007 12:36 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Comment updated December 24, 2007 12:59 PM
Ok I think we all can agree on what the adminstration would do. That is why I suggest an unorthodox way to approach the problems. One at a time is prefered. I am sure grassfire along with many other organization are being monitored for written suggestions so other communications need to be found.
December 24, 2007 12:42 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
September 28, 2007
The Lakota Indian tribe just announced this week that they are seceeding from the U.S.and would have their own government.  When I heard this I thought "How nice if the rest of us could do the same."  I'm not sure just what is going to happen with this but apparently they have had enough of the U.S. government.
December 24, 2007 12:54 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 2, 2007
Comment updated December 24, 2007 01:00 PM
I wonder what country they are moving to. There is only one government here.
December 24, 2007 01:01 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 27, 2007

Fed up, one thing I am doing in my area is to educate people with the real truth. In addition, write my congressmen at least once per week. Nothing beats staying in touch.


First 1 2 Last

You must login to discuss this item.