Which candidate do you believe?

Last night I watch some of the Democratic debate and one thing came to mind. It seems like the candidates are experts at campaigning and saying what we want to hear but there is no way they can deliver on their promises. The Republicans are guilty of this too. Which candidate do you think is the most sincere?

---

Republican or Democrat????

No sane Democrat is sincere--leading to Kucinik may be.

I may sound bipolar because, I am , at this moment planning to vote for someone else in the R party, but I believe Tom Tancredo to be the most sincere and most patriotic followed by, (a bit strange) , Ron Paul.

I am a registered Republican. I have been for over 40 years. I do not vote the party line. I try to find out about each candidate and vote based on platform and beliefs of the candidate.

I think Rudy is no different than any of the Democratic candidates. (As a matter of fact, I think he is a hypocrite and a self-interest person.)The rest of the slate of Republicans has a few "good guys" (Hunter, Thompson).

I would only vote for pne of them because the Dems have no good candidates to consider.

i wouldn't give ya a plug nickel for any Dem . Rudy IMO is a world class azz-wipe . RG is as dangeous as Bushco .

Tom T and Dr.Paul i think are real . but they'll never make it to the top . only Commies can rule America now with Trilan and CFR connections . Geeee

thanks so much David Rockefeller for all your money you truthly are a NutCase

 

FWIW , i wasn't impressed at all to vote from a very boring Debate . Billary reclaims her "Status" off last nights debate ??? oh gag me . how much did she pay off CNN , Fox etc to lay them off her real issues ?

 

i know my post looks nasty . But America is on a very quick slide to death caused by a lack of media and True Questions to the canidates .

did Anyone ask - Sen Clinton , are you a member of CFR ? is so why ?

Rudy - you've been married 3 times and support everything that pays you well . Do you really thing your clean ?

theres no Hard question . only the washing out of America  

---

The debates are a waste of time. All of the candidates are career politicians and they all have a record of what they support.Go back and look at what they voted for or promoted. With the exception of Paul, Tancredo, and Hunter they are all CFR and open borders promoters. What else needs to be said.

If you think they will change from what their past dictates just look at Chris Cannon's record.

The only thing surprising about this election is that Americans are going to vote for them instead of trying them for treason. Constitution Art.4 Sect4. 

where they swore to protect the states from foreign invasion. 

I found it rather amusing to hear all the talking heads rave about how Hillary recovered from her fall of several weeks ago, how she won the debate, etc.  I thought she looked like the b*tch she is, scowling and throwing mental daggers at Obama and Edwards especially, and nodding away like a bobblehead in the rear window of a pick up truck when Richardson talked about energy.  I didn't hear her say anything noteworthy, and I laughed outloud at her one word answer "NO" to the question about drivers licenses for illegals.  Ah me oh my, how hell doth quicken the spirit!  Compared to her, I found Biden and Dodd actually making sense, albeit it empty words because I doubt they could do what they say they'd do.  That said, the absolute BEST line in the whole debate came from moonbat Kucinich when talking about the Patriot Act said, "I voted no because I actually read it!"  Zing, zap, chalk one up for the loon!  BTW, what with her eyes and those cheeks?  She looked like she had plastic implants in her face that slipped or something.  She looked like Howdy Doody when she smiled.

---

I don't watch the Democrartic debates. I don't watch much of the Republiucan ones,either. The candidate who raised the most money in one day is marginalized while he actually makes some of the most sense along with Tom Tancredo. These are the guys the establishment doesn't want while 80% OF THE PEOPLE want immigration and border enforcement and 70% want us out of the boondogle ME waste of money. Real conservatives are apalled and the going to 9.8 trillion over triple Reagan's National Debt. Hunter is the only one you don't have to write in on GOP polls, who is for enforcement and securing the borders. It goes to show how deep the corruption goes in the GOP, like a cancer that has spread from the Demonrats to the RINOs.

ALL except Dr. Paul, Tancredo, and Hunter are just impure BS artists. That goes for both parties, with CFR/corporate globalist profiteers pulling their strings, and only the dimwitted suckers believing them.

---

I watched the whole thing (know thy enemy), and found it rather amusing.  Didn't watch the strategists afterward, but IMO, Hillary looked even worse last night on her answers.  One thing I DID notice is that they finally gave much more equal time, and in fact, seem to be ignoring Hillary alot of the time to an extent.  I think the debate-holders have been lamblasted for not giving  everyone on the stage equal time, so Wolf did better last night - except for the old guy, Gravel.

---

I do not watch the Democrat debats either.  I know enough about each of them from the face time they get on tv and what I looked up on the internet to know I won't be voting for any of them.  I will pay more attention after the primary and we know who their nominee is.

 

As to the question "Which candidate do you believe?"  I believe Tom Tancredo.  His campaign is focused and on message.  He has not wavered from his position on issues since being in the Colorado legislature.

Even Ron Paul is rearranging his priorities from "The constitution (stupid!)" and Federal Reserve to talk more about border security and illegal immigration.

I like Duncan Hunter a lot,  but his campaign lacks the passion for America that Tom Tancredo delivers at every opportunity.

 

---

speakengl said: I watched the whole thing (know thy enemy), and found it rather amusing.  Didn't watch the strategists afterward, but IMO, Hillary looked even worse last night on her answers.  One thing I DID notice is that they finally gave much more equal time, and in fact, seem to be ignoring Hillary alot of the time to an extent.  I think the debate-holders have been lamblasted for not giving  everyone on the stage equal time, so Wolf did better last night - except for the old guy, Gravel.

 

They were helping her keep her foot out of her mouth.  Just my guess.  I didn't watch.

---

Patsy said: I found it rather amusing to hear all the talking heads rave about how Hillary recovered from her fall of several weeks ago, how she won the debate, etc.  .

More people will hear those raves (repeatedly) than actually watched the debate.

---

There's not a question in my mind about that, msbobbie.  Most people don't watch debates, but most do at some point or other in the day hear a news report, or a talk show on radio in the car, etc. 

---

Patsy said: There's not a question in my mind about that, msbobbie.  Most people don't watch debates, but most do at some point or other in the day hear a news report, or a talk show on radio in the car, etc. 

People that missed that debate really missed a great vaudeville act.  It was totally amusing watching all those Dims weaving and tap dancing around the immigration issue.  More fun than a human being should be allowed to have!     

As for believing any of them, I can't believe any democrat.  On the Repub side, Tom and RP sound more truthful and probably are.  I believe they can afford to be because they may not have anything to lose.

---

Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo stand above all of them. 

msbobbie said:

speakengl said: I watched the whole thing (know thy enemy), and found it rather amusing.  Didn't watch the strategists afterward, but IMO, Hillary looked even worse last night on her answers.  One thing I DID notice is that they finally gave much more equal time, and in fact, seem to be ignoring Hillary alot of the time to an extent.  I think the debate-holders have been lamblasted for not giving  everyone on the stage equal time, so Wolf did better last night - except for the old guy, Gravel.

 

They were helping her keep her foot out of her mouth.  Just my guess.  I didn't watch.

 

Nope, you are absolutely right IMO.  The one time Wolfe could have really put her on the spot, he didn't.  And there were a couple of vague nonsensical answers she gave that everyone gave her a slide on too, but it was noticed becaue it was mentioned in the political analysis follow-ups.   It was eluded to in several comments in the couple days following that 'CNN gave Wolfe a talking to before the debate and cautioned him'. 

---

All of Hillary's answers seem vague. She is trying to come up with answers that please everyone. She is a fake, she does not stand for anything.

---

Noe of the candidates will answer a question they beat around the bush when a yes or no would suffice.

---

blaze77535 said: Noe of the candidates will answer a question they beat around the bush when a yes or no would suffice.

 

i wish they would Beat-Up Bush . then maybe they could show some BackBone

 

Tom T & Dr.Paul (maybe Duncan Hunter ) are real  IMO

they don't lie and a soild platform  

 

---

I can tell you this, I don't believe any of the Liberals as always because they make horrible leaders. Example- Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. The Conservatives aren't completely perfect either, but can be trusted more than Liberals by far.

---

MahaRushie37 said: I can tell you this, I don't believe any of the Liberals as always because they make horrible leaders. Example- Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. The Conservatives aren't completely perfect either, but can be trusted more than Liberals by far.

I support Fred Thompson but I will be voting for the Republican nominee no matter who it is because of what you said. They can be trusted much more than the liberals.

---

None. If there not for us they are against us. 

---