San Fran & more cities to give Illegal Aliens ID Cards...

Forums Home | Border Fires | Open Borders Agenda

Posts 1-2 of 2 | Latest Post
September 16, 2007 05:43 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 13, 2007

I find it interesting that city governments evidently have the right to give illegal aliens ID cards and expand their illegal activities but cannot act to restrict the extent of their illegal alien activities if they chose. 

That makes me wonder if New Haven or other cities who have given ID cards or other benefits have ever been sued by taxpayers to prevent that?

Turnabout would be fair play....

SovereignMan

 

San Francisco Chronicle

Supervisor Ammiano drafting legislation for ID card for illegals

Friday, September 7, 2007

San Francisco Supervisor Tom Ammiano is drafting legislation to create a city identification card for immigrants unable to get traditional ID cards, a move likely to anger advocates of tougher immigration enforcement.

The cards would be accepted by all city agencies and organizations that receive city funding. Ammiano plans to introduce the legislation within a couple of weeks. He also is trying to persuade financial institutions to allow residents to use the cards to open accounts.

"There is a large community who contribute, and there are not a lot of safeguards around their (immigration) status, their peace of mind and their ability to participate," Ammiano said, adding that the card would be available to all people living in San Francisco regardless of their immigration status.

San Francisco could be the first large American city to have such a card. New Haven, Conn., has such a program, and New York City is considering one.

Ammiano said the impetus for the city cards came from the immigrant community, which asked for his help. Illegal immigrants who are victims or witnesses of crime often do not report the incident because they have no identification and fear deportation. Identification also is needed for many services, such as city health care.

San Francisco already has a sanctuary policy for immigrants, which means no city agency, including the police, will assist the federal government to deport people. So-called sanctuary cities have become a major issue among Republican presidential candidates.

Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has been attacking former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani - including during a debate Wednesday night - over his city's sanctuary status. Romney broadcast a radio advertisement in Iowa and New Hampshire, where a voice-over states, "Immigration laws don't work if they're not enforced. That's the problem with cities like Newark, San Francisco and New York."

Later in the ad, Romney himself says that as president he would "cut back federal funds to cities that provide sanctuary to illegal immigrants," a pledge he repeated at the debate.

Mayor Gavin Newsom has been resolute in defending San Francisco's sanctuary status, and on Thursday his spokesman said Newsom supports Ammiano's idea for a card, which could be used for libraries, golf courses, public transportation and other services.

"The mayor strongly believes that this identification card should be extended to all San Franciscans, regardless of their immigration status," said Nathan Ballard, the mayor's spokesman.

The card also would be available to homeless people who prove they live in the city through a letter from a social service agency, Ammiano said. Currently, single-room-occupancy hotels require guests to leave an identification card at the front desk to enter the premises, which has been a burden on homeless visitors, Ammiano said.

Elderly people, youth and transgender people who face barriers to getting identification also would benefit from the card, he said.

New Haven began issuing the cards this summer. The application for the card is a simple form on which people can request that the information remain confidential. The card allows users access to the library and other public facilities and to put up to $150 on the card to pay for parking meters and for purchases at 50 stores in the city.

One immigrant-rights advocate said she had a "good feeling" about the cards becoming a reality in San Francisco.

"While they would not provide people permission to drive, and people aren't able to use them outside of San Francisco, they will really help undocumented immigrants ... with day-to-day functions," said Renee Saucedo, co-director of the San Francisco Day Labor Program, a project of La Raza Centra Legal.

September 16, 2007 06:22 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 13, 2007

Below is a letter that I sent to the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce and the Mayor's office. 

http://www.sfgov.org/site/mainpages_form.asp?id=18611

Steve Falk President & CEO - 415-352-8816   sfalk@sfchamber.com

Chamber Representative,

After reading the article below I must register my concern about the approach local government is taking with regards to public safety.

Sanctuary City policies such as the one in San Francisco have been proven to attract illegal aliens such as the ones that killed those innocent young people in Newark, NJ.

Rep. King (IA) recently cited a study that documented where over 9,000 Americans a year are killed at the hands of illegal aliens. Also, illegal aliens are responsible for thousands of other crimes including child molestations. The significance of this is felt nowhere more than in California where almost half of those incarcerated in the state prison are illegal aliens.

In this day and age, particularly with San Francisco being such a high profile location, it is difficult to understand why a city government would encourage and excuse criminal activity on such a wide scale.

While we will certainly miss visiting various places there that we enjoy as well as discovering others we have not yet experienced it is obvious that the safety of American visitors is not the primary concern of local government and it is just not responsible to place oneself in that environment if it can be avoided. Therefore, my wife and I have concluded that it would be best to no longer consider the Bay area as a place to vacation and will discourage associations we are members of from having meetings there.

Sincerely,


You must login to discuss this item.