JOHN HAWKINS INTERVIEW w/ TANCREDO

This interview is not dated.  It is lengthy but a must read for all of firesociety.

excerpt:

http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/tancredo.php

John Hawkins is that guy who threatened to do a  'larry flint' on Republicans who voted for that amnesty bill:

 http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007/05/googlebombing_proamnesty_senat.php

Interesting interview.  He gets it.  I am convinced that with Rep Tancredo as President my family will be as safe as possible given the issues of the day. 

First of all, for him to become President he will have defeated the neo-cons.  That in and of itself removes a lot of danger. 

For A Safe America, 

SovereignMan

I do not know how long ago this interview was done.  He speaks of Rumsfeld in the present tense and he is not talking about his campaign.

I was really impressed with the things he had to say about terrorism and the middle east.

One trick pony my foot!

If Mr Tancredo were a one trick pony, his congressional voting record would not be as good as it is.  So far, I haven't noticed one issue where his vote was the wrong way.  That, to me is amazing.  Check it out at   Project Vote Smart.

Local Residents Benefit From Mexican Consulate and WMMC Partnership

Rosa Minerva Gil’s identification card had recently expired, making it difficult for her to do simple transactions like cashing checks. So on Sunday, Feb. 25, Gil invited her husband and daughter for a short walk to White Memorial Medical Center, where she and other Mexican nationals registered for a matricula consular, a special identification card emitted by representatives of Mexican Consulate offices across the United States.

“I saw a sign in front of the hospital, and thought it was a great idea because many of us can’t get away from our jobs during the week to go to the Mexican Consulate’s office,” said Gil, who waited less than 45 minutes to complete the entire process.

Families started to show up at the White Memorial campus almost an hour before the event to make sure they were among the first people to receive legal services and free health screenings.

“More than 300 Mexican nationals benefited from this joint, collaborative effort,” said Consul General Ruben Beltran. “This was a wonderful experience. We’re compelled to continue working with White Memorial in favor of our community.”

White Memorial not only hosted and co-sponsored the event, but also offered cancer, diabetes, vascular and other medical screenings at no charge to the community. Also, a team of nurses from the Oscar De La Hoya Labor and Delivery Center at White Memorial were on-hand to offer free nutrition and health information to pregnant women.

“We are passionate about our mission to serve and our responsibility to be the best neighbor possible,” said Gabriela Barbarena, governing board member at White Memorial and president and CEO of ARAS Enterprises. “We thank Consul General Beltran for partnering with us to offer these vital and much needed services in our community.”

The Consulate General of Mexico in Los Angeles issues over eight thousand matricula consular cards each month to Mexicans living in Los Angeles.

Posted 3/13/07

I found this a while ago, I sent it with my e-mails during the amnesty bill.  The consulate's participate heavily with White Memorial.  I wonder if they recieve any tax dollars?

On July 1, 2007 the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 went into effect.  There will be no Federal dollars paid to any State for any Social Services to anyone provided to anyone who cannot prove U.S.   citizenship or ilegal residency.

States that continue to provide these services do so with State Tax Dollars.  Those  matricula consular, cards are simply a form of identification, and really worth no more than a utility bill.  The Mexican government has told these people that they are equal to a drivers license, but our government does not accept them as such.

That sounds wonderful, but what about the anchor babies?  If they claim an anchor baby - or two - - or four  they can get "Aid to Dependent Children" for each of those children and if they get paid under the table there is no proof of income.  With that, if the father is earning $25/hr on a 60 hour week it does not count as income and the mother still gets welfare for each child and WIC and Food Stamps.  I can't tell you how often I been in line in Wal Mart and watched a Spanish speaking family (large family) use food stamps for their groceries and then pull out a $100 bill to pay for the non food items.  The cashier will hold it up to the light to see that it is real and I'm standing there looking at  the rest of that person's roll of bills that is about a half in. thick and the next bill in the roll is a $100 bill as well.

Until we can wake up our law makers, that the 14th amendment makes only the babies of parents who are under the jurisdiction of OUR law, citizens (that would exclude the illegal law breakers because they have exempted themselves from our laws),  we will be stuck paying for all of their babies and they will have much more money than the average citizen.

Thank you for this interview post, msbobbie.  Tom Tancredo is the only candidate, except for Duncan Hunter, that has a lick of sense about any of the issues.  I am supporting Tom and praying that the Republican debates tomorrow morning on ABC, 9:00, EST will give him the momentum he needs to be pushed to the forefront of the "top tier." We hope that he will be given the time to voice his views and not be cut off in mid stream.  He really is for the American people as well as turning the country into a functioning entity.  

Thank you, too, for that update on the Deficit Reduction Act.  Hopefully the states won't be whining about "no moniesa" for the poor illegals. 

Patriot's Pixie said:

That sounds wonderful, but what about the anchor babies?  If they claim an anchor baby - or two - - or four  they can get "Aid to Dependent Children" for each of those children and if they get paid under the table there is no proof of income.  With that, if the father is earning $25/hr on a 60 hour week it does not count as income and the mother still gets welfare for each child and WIC and Food Stamps.  I can't tell you how often I been in line in Wal Mart and watched a Spanish speaking family (large family) use food stamps for their groceries and then pull out a $100 bill to pay for the non food items.  The cashier will hold it up to the light to see that it is real and I'm standing there looking at  the rest of that person's roll of bills that is about a half in. thick and the next bill in the roll is a $100 bill as well.

Until we can wake up our law makers, that the 14th amendment makes only the babies of parents who are under the jurisdiction of OUR law, citizens (that would exclude the illegal law breakers because they have exempted themselves from our laws),  we will be stuck paying for all of their babies and they will have much more money than the average citizen.

On one of these threads there is another interview ( maybe a link to an interview ) where Tom contends that the 14th amendment has been misinterpeted.  It is the interview where the interviewer says "uh-huh" a lot.

I have said many times that the 'laws' that allow for anchor babies was a Supreme Court decision.

I do not know what could be done about the millions of anchor babies we already have, but Tom and a sympathetic congress could certainly put a quick end to the practice and limit the number of extended family they could sponsor.

Here is another Tom/14th amendment link: