BwWhaley

Forums Home | Fire Society Administration | Suspensions and Bans

Posts 1-20 of 205 | Latest Post

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Last
July 16, 2007 01:12 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
What happened to this person? Not officially banned so what ahppened?
July 16, 2007 01:49 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 19, 2007
Comment updated July 16, 2007 02:23 AM
Gerald47 said: What happened to this person? Not officially banned so what ahppened?

 

Probably still in shock after been tracked to Tennessee by the complainer who said he was a no good liar because he stated he lived in Texas where a bunch of illegals were arrested and she said it didn't happen.  I checked with ICE and sure enough it did, just as he had posted.  So much for some complainers' credibility.

If you recall, I came back and let her know that his telephone area code is 214 (Dallas, Texas) and his business office is in Downtown Dallas.  Odd, she never did reply back.  I think it was MrT I told to not worry too much about being tracked while using his passport if high tech isn't advanced enough to detect the difference between being in Tennessee and being in Texas.  Smile

He was a big supporter of Bush and Fred Thompson and agreed a lot with Melinda of Tennessee.  She has probably been tracked by those who always attack her posts as really being Melinda of Catalina Island, California. 

With all the conspiracy theories we're exposed to maybe Melinda is really a plant whose hidden agenda is to create support for drafting Michael Chertoff to run as the Republican nominee on the strength of his record as The Fence Builder Czar.




When things seem bad they aren't always as they appear. Usually, they are much worse. Disclaimer: As to any and all legal information presented within my posted comments none should be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer/attorney client relationship. The legal information which may be contained within my comments is based upon my legal education; prior and/or present case(s) preparation and legal research; and, therefore, do not represent any promise(s) or guarantee(s) with respect to using any information provided. Please contact the Law Office of a known and competent lawyer/attorney in your state for a consultation on your particular civil or criminal legal matter.
July 16, 2007 02:19 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
So, since you've communicated with him off this forum as you stated, will he be back or not? What does Sean say?
July 16, 2007 02:22 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 19, 2007

Gerald47:

I don't think Sean has said anything.




When things seem bad they aren't always as they appear. Usually, they are much worse. Disclaimer: As to any and all legal information presented within my posted comments none should be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer/attorney client relationship. The legal information which may be contained within my comments is based upon my legal education; prior and/or present case(s) preparation and legal research; and, therefore, do not represent any promise(s) or guarantee(s) with respect to using any information provided. Please contact the Law Office of a known and competent lawyer/attorney in your state for a consultation on your particular civil or criminal legal matter.
July 16, 2007 02:26 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
I also believe there has been many attitude adjustments in this forum since then, and should he be allowed to return there would be more tolerance to his rhetoric. He posts well and uses sharp intellect and has knowledge and backs it too. I for one wish Sean would make a comment to his status and decide one way or the other. Melinda on Catalina. Wow! lucky lady. LOL.
July 16, 2007 04:25 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007

LOL, she/he is not me and I don't have him/her. Laughing  I'm still home on the farm.  Who's Melinda on Catalina.

Don't get the conspiracy nuts started. Geesh!




"Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ anonymous ~
July 16, 2007 01:26 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 23, 2007
Comment updated July 16, 2007 01:34 PM

It would appear that BwWhaley is in a state of limbo and I for one miss him. I believe his first amendment rights were violated and I also learned a valuable lesson about mob rule. An angry mob of people on this forum did not agree with Bw's views and so they went behind his back and had him banned. This same group of people claim to be patriots and stand for our rights yet when the rubber meets the road they fold like a lawn chair.

 

Esquire:

Yes it was me that you told not to worry about being tracked while using my passport. I would also like to point out an example of the good advice Esquire has given many of the members on this forum. In our disscusion about passports some of the members worried that the government would track them using their passports and said they would like to deface their passports and remove the magnetic strips or something. Esquire was the level headed one who pointed out what a stupid idea that was.

I am learning a lot reading the comments of FireSociety members. The difference in views is what keeps the debates educational. If we ban members with opposing views I will no longer participate.

 




Check out MrT's latest diabolical creation: http://pollingplace.forumotion.com/
July 16, 2007 01:42 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
Can you say limbo on this forum? Isn't that assuming R.C. is correct? JUST KIDDING, yes it does have other meanings, although secondary. And, yes it does seem that bww's status remains oblivious, which isn't in character to what has happened in the past to others. MrT great point, exactly what I was trying to convey that via the Min.Men those that oppose it could for $25 get a yearly membership card and reek havoc within that organization via vigilante mob tactics while waving their cards in the air. A little different but for the same end. Bring back bww, or at least inform us as to why exactly he can no longer be in the forum.
July 16, 2007 01:49 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007
Esquire - I've had to snicker to myself a few times about your disclaimer.  Not hard to tell you're a lawyer.  If not, you covered your tracks well.  You forgot "professional driver, closed course, do not attempt"!Laughing  Just kiddin!


My Vice Presidential candidate can whip your Presidential candidate!
July 16, 2007 01:49 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 23, 2007
Hi Gerald, oh man, maybe I should not have used the word limbo, time to dig out my thesaurus.


Check out MrT's latest diabolical creation: http://pollingplace.forumotion.com/
July 16, 2007 01:50 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 5, 2007
Why would anyone want to deface your passport. You will not be allowed to use it if it has been defaced. I kinda miss ol bw if only some of the post had not been so long.


TEXAS: One of the few states that can secede from the Union.
July 16, 2007 01:57 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 23, 2007
Comment updated July 16, 2007 02:18 PM

Some of the members were a little paranoid and thought the government was tracking them via their passports Blaze, that is why they wanted to deface them. As you have correctly pointed out you cannot use a defaced passport.

I must be living a much more boring life then many of you, I don't think the government is following me.




Check out MrT's latest diabolical creation: http://pollingplace.forumotion.com/
July 16, 2007 02:34 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
MrT, That was great! More than LOL.
July 16, 2007 03:11 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007
I suppose it's a wonder I'm still here.  I haven't received a warning so far.  This type of thing has happened in other forums.  Certain supporters of a certain person intentionally get people banned if they don't support that certain person, if you get what I mean.  There is a Fred Thompson forum that has been completely taken over by these supporters of that certain person.  This one will be next if all the Fred Thompson supporters keep getting banned for standing their ground.  I haven't noticed that bwwhaley ever said anything questionable.  Like you said, mob rule!


"Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ anonymous ~
July 16, 2007 03:44 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 15, 2007

Just for you Melinda in TN.  Now tell me that Fred Thompson being on the CFR means nothing to you.  These aren't conspiracy theories.... Good old innocent Fred Thompson!  Maybe you would prefer life under this kind of rule?

 

http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/treasonabounds.html

July 16, 2007 04:00 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007
NOTICE Forum Title: BwWhaley - NOT Fred, NOT CFR, NOT ...................


My Vice Presidential candidate can whip your Presidential candidate!
July 16, 2007 04:04 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 6, 2007
What a hoot. Eh!?
July 16, 2007 04:13 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
June 19, 2007
Comment updated July 16, 2007 04:34 PM
Melinda in TN said: I suppose it's a wonder I'm still here.  I haven't received a warning so far.  This type of thing has happened in other forums.  Certain supporters of a certain person intentionally get people banned if they don't support that certain person, if you get what I mean.  There is a Fred Thompson forum that has been completely taken over by these supporters of that certain person.  This one will be next if all the Fred Thompson supporters keep getting banned for standing their ground.  I haven't noticed that bwwhaley ever said anything questionable.  Like you said, mob rule!

Melinda in Tn or wherever you are presently encamped, possibly as someone else:

From what I've read you have had a nasty habit of "attacking the messenger" instead of the message, even on the threads you've created. Go figure. And we all know that the anti-PC mob (who actually do love PCing when it serves their purposes) don't like their messengers "attacked."

Additionally, it's quite recently been disclosed that you "are really turning into the "vermin" that Michael Savage speaks about." Further, it's come to our collective attention that it's, "Time to get off your Trotskyist high horse and actually learn about what our Founding Fathers taught us. Moreover, thanks to others far more astute than are you, "We [they] want liberty, you want government control of our lives."

Who can possibly dare to agree with you or even think to defend your posts when you've been labeled as Trotskyist high-horse riding vermin? Worse, you are morphing into vermin that doesn't want liberty. Worse still, you promote government control of our (?) lives? Sounds to me, like you must indeed be a messenger attacking offender. Otherwise would one or more passionate persons step up to the plate to bring such charges against you? And we all know that once someone is indicted (BP Agents or otherwise) the presumption is they’ve committed some serious offense, even if the one(s) with which they are charged are untrue or frivolous.

But, then again, for my remark about my listening to what Fred Thompson has to say and leaning more in his direction than I was previously leaning against it I've lost my credibility with respect to practicing law. Further, I'm now under suspicion that I'm Kenneth Treuter and I should take due notice that he was banned (BWWhaley’s fate as well) from esteemed membership herein.

Perhaps, we had better be more prudent in watching our "p"s and "q"s. In order for me to stay in good standing, I'm now seriously giving consideration to enrolling in a conservative PCspeak class.




When things seem bad they aren't always as they appear. Usually, they are much worse. Disclaimer: As to any and all legal information presented within my posted comments none should be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer/attorney client relationship. The legal information which may be contained within my comments is based upon my legal education; prior and/or present case(s) preparation and legal research; and, therefore, do not represent any promise(s) or guarantee(s) with respect to using any information provided. Please contact the Law Office of a known and competent lawyer/attorney in your state for a consultation on your particular civil or criminal legal matter.
July 16, 2007 04:19 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007

ONCE AGAIN - NOTICE Forum Title: BwWhaley - NOT Fred, NOT CFR, NOT personal attacks, NOT ................... Some people are gettin' too rowdy!  Don't make me come over there!

Frown




My Vice Presidential candidate can whip your Presidential candidate!
July 16, 2007 04:29 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007
Comment updated July 16, 2007 04:48 PM

Laughing @ Esquire and Jim from Texas. What is a Trotskyist?  I also had to go back and see who called me a vermin.  I might have known.  I usually skip over his posts.

 

LadyJane, this thread is about a missing member. If you must attack me, do it on a Fred Thompson thread.




"Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ~ anonymous ~

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Last

You must login to discuss this item.