Is the SPP/NAU attempt constituional?

Forums Home | Border Fires | Amnesty and the Fence

Posts 1-6 of 6 | Latest Post
June 10, 2007 10:43 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 29, 2007

 

If anyone can site that the Security and Prosperity Plan is un-constitutional, I would appreciate it.  We all could use some ammo to get this thrown out of the immigration bill.

 




Rayj
First you're born, you pay taxes, you die.
Then your next of kin has to pay more taxes
on your funeral! How fair is that?

http://www.fairtax.org
FairTax Calculator!

This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.
Tom Tancredo - 2007
Tom's Military Rules of Engagement: WE WIN!

Winston Churchill - "An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last."

"Victory will never be found by taking the line of least resistance."

Proud member of the NRA....although I don't even own a pistol or rifle......

The sooner Mecca's ambient temperature is raised to roughly 250,000 degrees fahrenheit, the better....
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

June 10, 2007 06:27 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 2, 2007
Comment updated June 10, 2007 06:28 PM
Hey Ray, is there a link or something where one can find a brief,succinct synopsis of the SPP/NAU? Once I see exactly what is involved I can shop it through the Constitution.


June 10, 2007 07:43 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 29, 2007

The most detailed information can be found at http://www.spp.gov but what out for their bullcrap....

And here are just a few links of interest:

 http://www.stopthenau.org/

 http://www.stopspp.org/

 http://www.spp-nau.info/

 Note that many states are passing anti-spp/nau legislation. Maybe that's another way to keep the pressure on the feds?

 




Rayj
First you're born, you pay taxes, you die.
Then your next of kin has to pay more taxes
on your funeral! How fair is that?

http://www.fairtax.org
FairTax Calculator!

This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.
Tom Tancredo - 2007
Tom's Military Rules of Engagement: WE WIN!

Winston Churchill - "An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last."

"Victory will never be found by taking the line of least resistance."

Proud member of the NRA....although I don't even own a pistol or rifle......

The sooner Mecca's ambient temperature is raised to roughly 250,000 degrees fahrenheit, the better....
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

June 10, 2007 07:56 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 29, 2007

 

And here is a brief look at how to get an amendment passed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsuccessful_attempts_to_amend_the_U.S._Constitution

As you will see...not an easy task...but it obviously has been done before...

The United States Constitution has been amended 27 times since the Constitution was ratified in 1788. Far more proposals to amend the country's supreme law are unsuccessful.




Rayj
First you're born, you pay taxes, you die.
Then your next of kin has to pay more taxes
on your funeral! How fair is that?

http://www.fairtax.org
FairTax Calculator!

This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.
Tom Tancredo - 2007
Tom's Military Rules of Engagement: WE WIN!

Winston Churchill - "An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last."

"Victory will never be found by taking the line of least resistance."

Proud member of the NRA....although I don't even own a pistol or rifle......

The sooner Mecca's ambient temperature is raised to roughly 250,000 degrees fahrenheit, the better....
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

June 10, 2007 08:20 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 2, 2007

From what i read of that, it is a treaty.  And treaties MUST be ratified by the Senate.  This is certainly not something Bush could just mandate.  He would have to have willing accomplices in the Senate like he does with amnesty.  We would have to be as up-in-arms about that as we were over amnesty.

Of course that Constitutional amendment I wrote would handle it.




May 2, 2008 12:16 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 8, 2007

SPP and NAU agenda is moving right along as a result of April meeting with leaders!!!

SPP Renewed in Plans for NAU

2 05 2008

The besieged Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America received a renewed commitment from all three NAFTA leaders at the recent summit in New Orleans. This is a much needed boast for the North American Union agenda that is seen as widely unpopular. There is little doubt that big business is a driving force behind deeper continental integration. The latest SPP Summit reaffirmed that corporate interests will continue to further dominate this process. The corporate agenda is shaping policy, and as their profits increase, they gain more control over our lives.

The SPP is the brainchild of business and political elites who wish to advance North American integration. In June of 2006, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) was launched, and is the only formal advisory board in the SPP. The NACC represents private corporate interests, and through the SPP, transnational corporate rights are being further empowered. In February of 2007, the NACC made 51 proposals to SPP negotiators. They are essentially formulating policy and using the SPP to lay the foundation for a North American Union. The NACC is now actively promoting energy privatization in Mexico. It is the multinational corporations who have the most to gain from the SPP.

Bruce Campbell, the executive director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, lays out just how the SPP structure operates. He said, “Business conveys its demand, the politicians respond, consensus is reached, and civil servants implement. This takes the privatization of public policy-making to a new level.” Stuart Trew of the Council of Canadians said, “These corporate recommendations are going directly to the respective bureaucracies, and they are being pushed heavily.”

Before the Leader Summit, the NACC released a report where they stated, “Our most critical request to the leaders is for them to ensure that the SPP remains a dynamic and effective path forward for trilateral and bilateral co-operation.” There was some fear that this agenda might be further stalled or replaced with something else. Not to worry, because here is what Bush had to say about the NACC’s recommendations, “I’m looking forward to hearing them, and I’m looking forward to implementing them.” Mexican President Calderon also said, “we need to work within the North American Competitiveness Council, where the three leaders agreed we fully need to support the work of this Competitiveness Council.” It sounds like the SPP is back on track, and the NACC and corporate interests will have even more clout.

Recent national polls reflect that the majority of Canadians and Americans wish to retain their sovereignty and reject the secrecy surrounding the SPP. I guess most people think it is a big deal when powerful and influential corporate elites and politicians meet in private, plotting the destruction of the country. Dismantling of the borders will allow for the freer flow of goods and cheap labor, which will increase corporate profits at the expense of our sovereignty and prosperity.

The big loser of the SPP summit is transparency in government and the will of the people. The transfer of power from our elected representatives to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats is being further accelerated. We must continue to resist the North American Union and the complete corporate takeover of the continent.

 

Dana Gabriel. infowars.com


 


You must login to discuss this item.