I consider Agents Ramos and Compean political prisoners

Forums Home | Border Fires | Border Agents Under Fire!

Posts 1-14 of 14 | Latest Post
April 12, 2007 12:37 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 14, 2007

Agents Ramos, Compean and the others are in prison because they have run afoul of a tyrannical president.  

Seven years ago and even before I never imagined that George Bush could be this kind of man.  But it becomes more apparent every day that all of the law enforcement officers, who have experienced the wrath of Bush's buddy, Johnny Sutton, are sitting in a prison cell today simply because they have angered a tyrant.

This tyrant is determined to destroy the Constitution of the United States and establish a North American Union. 

The citizens of this country will not allow that to happen; therefore, the U. S. must be flooded with the illegal aliens who would like nothing better than for the U. S. to become a part of Mexico. 

The brave men who have the dangerous job of protecting the borders of this country (and its citizens) are in the cross hairs of this tyrant.  If more cross this man they, too, will become political prisoners and their lives will be destroyed.

How many more lives and families will be destroyed before this man is stopped?




A government that is big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. *************************************************************************************** Free Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean!
April 12, 2007 12:46 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
April 6, 2007
Probably many many more. We've got to do something. Whats going on now is not cutting it, we have to keep getting more and more aggressive.


Jesus is the light and the way, not the government. ||| http://www.mycountryiwantitback.com -Founder & Owner, Patriotic Citizens Of America ||| Patriotic Citizens Of America's Chatroom ||| Want to join PCOA in its battle to secure our borders and enable Americans? Then please visit the website above, or contact me at Patriot@mycountryiwantitback.com
April 12, 2007 02:02 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 12, 2007

Yes they are. The beating the one took in Yazoo is proof enough to me that they tried to execute him. He should have never been released to general population. That could not of happened by accident. 17 years I did that work and that is not possible an accident.

April 12, 2007 10:14 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 17, 2007

Dane, I agree. I myself being ex-law enforcement believe that serving to protect at this day in time could land you in prison.  I myself am glad I escaped the hold of possibly being a fall guy for a elected offical looking to make himself look better or gain a vote from a group of illegals.

LIVE FREE & SPEAK FREE !!




My question to everyone, is there anything & I mean anything that you as a person an indivisual should not be able to speak? There is only one answer. (NO!!) it is all about common sense. Those who says yes, or hesitate have lost their way.
April 12, 2007 10:50 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007

There's as much of a double-standard in the government as there is in the media.  Sutton claims the agents violated the "civil rights" of the aliens and thus broke the law.  Yet, in the book Constututional Chaos: What Happens when the Government Breaks its own Laws, the author cites almost one hundred different cases in which state, federal, and government authorities blatantly violated regulations and state and federal laws to capture a criminal (even though many of them hadn't done anything until they were illegally coerced).  Here are a few examples:

-Cops demanding "protection money" from legal immigrants and then arresting them when they answered "yes" to having a gun.

-Cops sealing off a public area in preparation for a drug bust and arresting anyone who tries to leave, despite the area being public.

-Cops and the FBI kidnapping suspects and forcing them across state lines without warrants.

-"Terror suspects" arrested under authority from George W. Bush and John Ashcroft, then held in Guantanamo Bay and stripped of their Sixth Amendment rights because they're  declared to be "enemy combatants" despite there being no evidence they collaborated with terrorists.

-The FBI, led by Janet Reno, using military tanks, gas, and forced to eliminate 86 civilians, shooting them as they attempted to flee a burning building, and allowing them to die horrible deaths over a machine gun tax issue.

-Janet Reno having the wife of a man who ran a day care center in Miami physically and psychologically tortured and brainwashed her until she "confessed" her husband has molested the children in his care.

And many more.

What was the government's reaction?  Promotions, commendations, cover-ups of their own mistakes, high profile positions for some, and claims they have the authority to suspend the Constitution during wartime. 




Christianity is anti-war, but you wouldn't know that from Christians: As explained here
Truth comes from God, not from government, yet more people these days only listen to the government.
Proud member of the group that Michael Reagan and a few FS members want to kill simply because we wish to exercise our First Amendment rights and ask questions: the truth-seekers.
April 12, 2007 11:55 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 8, 2007
suspend the constitution huh? I dont remember anyone declaring war.


Deport congress and the president!!
April 12, 2007 08:08 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 16, 2007
Read that book.  John Ashcroft gave himself the power to do that with no opposition from any of the three branches.


Christianity is anti-war, but you wouldn't know that from Christians: As explained here
Truth comes from God, not from government, yet more people these days only listen to the government.
Proud member of the group that Michael Reagan and a few FS members want to kill simply because we wish to exercise our First Amendment rights and ask questions: the truth-seekers.
April 12, 2007 08:36 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 17, 2007

Dyne, Good example of the King & Queens of Washington D.C. They believe we are here to serve them at all cost, never to be questioned of their wrong doings by those who serve them. This is why our voice is silenced, the power they think they hold, they are passing illegal laws to stop public outcry by everyone, except themselves. When I was in law enforcement, we were told never to write a citiation for a driver or passenger who did not have their seatbelt on, even though it was the law, it is their right to choose was the rule, as well we were told we could not use the "Seatbelt" law to make a traffic stop as the only reason. The law for the seatbelt was a good thought for you & your families safety, seatbelts do save lives, you should always make sure your chilren are secure abiding by the law to protect them from stupid parents, but you as an adult, should be able to make that decision on your own as if you wear a seatbelt or not. But now this law is used to make a traffic stop & get the chance to start questioning you, most of the time everyone makes a mistake, driving a car of a sibling which smokes pot & you do not know, really, you do not know, we have you pulled over & ask, do you have anything in the vehicle such as Drugs & Guns, your response no. We ask may we take a look in your vehicle, you knowing you have nothing to worry about all of a sudden hear one of us say, who's marijuana is this? Your response, I do not know. This does happen, someone not guilty of any crime other than driving down the street without a seatbelt on in someone elses vehicle. Know this person is turned into a possible felon depending on the amount & the state laws. This law was first made to make you think your government cares, it does, only about getting deeper in your life & taking away your rights without anyone questioning them. It is all about control, the control of the population.

LIVE FREE & SPEAK FREE !!




My question to everyone, is there anything & I mean anything that you as a person an indivisual should not be able to speak? There is only one answer. (NO!!) it is all about common sense. Those who says yes, or hesitate have lost their way.
April 12, 2007 09:24 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 12, 2007

ManforFreedom trust me I understand government corruption. They blew a hit on me once and had numerous times where they tried to set me up to get burned. I could write a B movie and it would all be true. The Uncle is a wicked sword.

April 12, 2007 11:14 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 12, 2007
Sutton was following orders....
April 12, 2007 11:30 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 11, 2007

I'll add that I'm retired law enforcement and glad I retired before this mess began.

Tyrant is a good description of what we've got in the White House. And the royalty in Congress, with a few black sheep who won't toe the line, are just as bad. They have all got to go.

I never thought I'd agree with the moonbats but I've come to the conclusion, if for different reasons, that Bush has to go, and soon.




"Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils." General John Stark
April 13, 2007 09:09 AM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 17, 2007

Dane, you & I both, I tell my wife if I could write a book, the public would just be shocked at what really goes on behind the closed door of Government. Uncle Sam does not care about those who enforce the laws correctly, we can simply see this by the Border Agents being jailed for doing the sworn duty. As far as movies, I think it would rate an A easy. Think about the U.N. wanting to use N.Y.P.D for international peace enforcement, those poor bastards, they will end up being fall guys for sure. During the "War on Drugs" we did the same, only we ended up in South America for short stints.

LIVE FREE & SPEAK FREE !!




My question to everyone, is there anything & I mean anything that you as a person an indivisual should not be able to speak? There is only one answer. (NO!!) it is all about common sense. Those who says yes, or hesitate have lost their way.
April 13, 2007 04:07 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
March 2, 2007
Comment updated April 13, 2007 04:13 PM

HI There!  I do definitely agree and totally believe 100%, that Border Patrol agents Ramos and Compean are indeed Political Prisons of the Bush Administration.  The Following is a link to a recent News Article from World Net Daily, Title: 'Bush's war on law enforcement:'
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55164

 

 

April 13, 2007 05:19 PM    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
February 8, 2007
I sat down and wrote a letter to that senator asking him to please reconsider stepping up the investigation. I personally would no want to be sitting in prison waiting for this kind of justice.


Deport congress and the president!!

You must login to discuss this item.