Teaching California Kindergarteners to be Transsexual, Bisexual and Homosexual?-IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT THEM TEACHING YOUR CHILDREN????

For article....

Click here: Campaign for Children and Families: Wednesday, March 28, 2007

---

That article leaves me outraged and feeling sick. I can not believe something so outragous could be passed anywhere much less this country. It truly sounds like the homo's are tring to inflict their sick ideas down everyones throat, and if you object you get a lawsuit thrown at you. This needs to stop.

The republican heirarchy from what I have heard is controlled by queers. The Texas child welfare dept.  and also in Florida (what family has been running the shows there) are full of pedophiles who place these confiscated children in the care of perverts. It's only natural that we would want to train the children that this behavior is ok so they will not think it wrong when people in authority  place them in an environment where these CRIMES can be fostered upon them. OUR GOV. IS FULL OF SICK,EVIL PEOPLE and we need to put a stop to it now!

---

This disturbs me to my very soul. How can this have happened in the greatest country on earth? How in the world did we get to the point of such lunacy and pandering to the extremist fringe groups? I heard a statistic stating that 10% of our population is gay. Ok, yes that is an outrageous amount and ridiculous to even entertain such an extravagant amount but just for arguments sake let's say that it is true. If indeed 10% of the population is gay then we are going to force the homosexual agenda down the throats of the 90% majority to appease a very small minority? Where is the sense and logic in that? How is it that fanatic, extremists can dictate policy for the majority of us with dissenting views? On a personal note I have two young children in the public school system but rest assured that they are armed with a contrary value system and are taught the biblical perspective about homosexuality. In my oppinion homosexuality is a choice and I don't interfere in the lives of those who choose it. Why then should they be allowed to determine what and how I will think, believe, or feel about their lifestyle?

---

It happens because the nature of the wolf is to be sneaky and aggressive and the nature of a sheep is to be trusting and not really too watchful. Unfortunate but true. Ill bet they will also crack down with laws on homeschooling too so you cant get away from it.

Watch how when they argue an issue the lawyers twist the law for gay saying they are being persecuted just like the illegals and the others who claim to be against it, really dont argue it constitutionally at all. It makes me wonder if they are actually against it.

---

I am also sick that such a law would even be considered in any state. If we don't continue to pull together and make our voices heard  every group in the USA will be trying to get this kind out outrage into law. We need to stand behind Grassfire and sign every petition and try to support them financially. Our voices can/will be heard.

Exactly Mary, its an open door to anyone who wants to go after their own "pursit of happiness" in a legal way and win. What if murder made one happy. What if pedephile made one happy. What if rape made one happy. How about robbery? Do they have rights for kidnapping if that makes them happy. Its so dangerous to go in one direction or another on this. You can end up with it being used to shut christianity up or even a minor opinoin because it apposes the majoraty, or it can end up with that minoraty controling the country by training all our children to become clones of themselves which does open up to way more evil. Orientation is not in the constitution. Arny is right to stay away from this one in either direction. Veto , veto , and keep vetoing.

---

Karonica said: For article.... Click here: Campaign for Children and Families: Wednesday, March 28, 2007

 

 

I find the timing of these burning issues suspicious.

Mr. Swartzenegger's past (and present) are detestable.

And just like Bush, these BURNING issues of "life and death" (basically, distractions from the BIGGER picture) always seem to be "the light" which draws the "right" to the deadly flame.  If it wasn't for fear, what would they do?

The ENTIRE message here is that Swartzenegger is our savior. He is NOT! He is a foreigner who seeks, along with his band of Constitution-hating CONservatives to destroy the TIME TESTED wisdom of our Forebearers, who were led OF YAHWEH when founding this great nation.

I will not even go into details about his NAZI connections and then the TOTAL CONNECTION between Zionism and Nazism "ZioNAZIsm". The occult... Same as Bush. It's all one great big happy family of evil-doers.

---

Its kind of like a snake biting the right person for a change huh Elijah...lol

---

bugsygirl said: Its kind of like a snake biting the right person for a change huh Elijah...lol

 

 

Easily done when the blind cross his path, no? They cannot even 'see' that he is there.

---

Vemmaguy said: This disturbs me to my very soul. How can this have happened in the greatest country on earth? How in the world did we get to the point of such lunacy and pandering to the extremist fringe groups? I heard a statistic stating that 10% of our population is gay. Ok, yes that is an outrageous amount and ridiculous to even entertain such an extravagant amount but just for arguments sake let's say that it is true. If indeed 10% of the population is gay then we are going to force the homosexual agenda down the throats of the 90% majority to appease a very small minority? Where is the sense and logic in that? How is it that fanatic, extremists can dictate policy for the majority of us with dissenting views? On a personal note I have two young children in the public school system but rest assured that they are armed with a contrary value system and are taught the biblical perspective about homosexuality. In my oppinion homosexuality is a choice and I don't interfere in the lives of those who choose it. Why then should they be allowed to determine what and how I will think, believe, or feel about their lifestyle?

It happened because we became to complacent. We became a silent majority, not believing that this could happen. It's like I said before on another forum, we had the Ostrich Sndrome. We buried our heads in the sand and hoped that it would go away. Now it is going to bite us in the butt unless we stand up now and be counted.

If we all held our school boards accountable, and told the state and national education associations that they will not teach our children this crap, and withheld the funds, then maybe they will listen. But, as long as we remain silent and sit back and wring our hands and moan, nothing will change. It is time to stop wringing our hands and start wringing some necks!!!

 

---

It never fails to amaze me how people can so uncritical of what they read:

"By prohibiting any textbook or instruction “reflecting adversely” upon a variety of sexual lifestyles, SB 777 would, in effect, require all instruction to positively portray transsexuality, bisexuality and homosexuality because silence on these sexual lifestyles would no longer be permitted. Consequently, schools would have to promote “same-sex marriages” and even sex-change procedures."

This statement is obviously nonsense. How on earth can you construe "prohibition of refelcting adversely" on something as being equivalent to "positively portraying" it? Why can't any of you see this? You're getting riled up over nothing!

Before you spout off accusing me of being a liberal/idiot/homosexual/whatever, please just explain how one equals the other. I'd really like to know. Maybe I'll even agree with you if you make a convincing argument.

---

It would be nice if corporations and special interests kept out of school and the school stuck to the basics of teaching what they need and is age appropriate. Why should things like this even enter our schools?

---

Ramshackle said: It never fails to amaze me how people can so uncritical of what they read: "By prohibiting any textbook or instruction “reflecting adversely” upon a variety of sexual lifestyles, SB 777 would, in effect, require all instruction to positively portray transsexuality, bisexuality and homosexuality because silence on these sexual lifestyles would no longer be permitted. Consequently, schools would have to promote “same-sex marriages” and even sex-change procedures." This statement is obviously nonsense. How on earth can you construe "prohibition of refelcting adversely" on something as being equivalent to "positively portraying" it? Why can't any of you see this? You're getting riled up over nothing! Before you spout off accusing me of being a liberal/idiot/homosexual/whatever, please just explain how one equals the other. I'd really like to know. Maybe I'll even agree with you if you make a convincing argument.

adverse; 1)acting against or in a contrary direction: (hostile) 2) opposed to one's interests: unfavorable 3) opposite in position

 

---

John07 said:  adverse; 1)acting against or in a contrary direction: (hostile) 2) opposed to one's interests: unfavorable 3) opposite in position

 

 

Great, but you didn't answer the question.  It's the reflecting part that's the crux of the matter.  It nowhere says you can't hold adverse beliefs  - just that you can't preach them to students.  How is that the same as promoting the opposite beliefs?  

---

Ramshackle said:

John07 said:  adverse; 1)acting against or in a contrary direction: (hostile) 2) opposed to one's interests: unfavorable 3) opposite in position

    Great, but you didn't answer the question.  It's the reflecting part that's the crux of the matter.  It nowhere says you can't hold adverse beliefs  - just that you can't preach them to students.  How is that the same as promoting the opposite beliefs?  

The ones who are pushing this agenda, the homosexual activists, don't want anyone to be be allowed to oppose their direction or interests.  One definition for reflect is to have a bearing or influence. They don't want anyone to have anything to say, or be able to do anything to get in their way or stop them from pushing their perversion on young children. It has nothing to do with acceptance or inclusiveness. It is brain washing indoctrination pure and simple.

 

---

---

It doesn't surprise me a bit. They have kids memorizing text from the Koran and playing Jihad roles.  The National Education Ass. is the equivalant of Al Queda with taxpayer funded madrasas K-12.

---

John07 said:  The ones who are pushing this agenda, the homosexual activists, don't want anyone to be be allowed to oppose their direction or interests. One definition for reflect is to have a bearing or influence. They don't want anyone to have anything to say, or be able to do anything to get in their way or stop them from pushing their perversion on young children. It has nothing to do with acceptance or inclusiveness. It is brain washing indoctrination pure and simple.

 

 

You're really weaseling now.  I asked how not reflecting is tantamount to promoting the opposite.  You have responded by simply reiterating the fact that you think it is, without demonstrating why.  Is this the best you've got?

---

If the text or verbal teaching is positive and "all inclusive" of the decadent lifestyle, then one would not be allowed to "reflect"/speak negativelly or dispute such rubish.

---