Head for the Hill

By JHK | February 18, 2008 08:58 AM

Printer Friendly Comments (13)
Login to Bookmark Email to a Friend
Rating Number of Ratings: 3

Login to Rate
 

Ron Paul wants to organize a peaceful march on Washington very soon, he says.Undecided I sent an e-mail to the doctor explaining what I would do.Wink I'm waiting for his response. Let me premise this with the fact that MLK got about a million people to descend on Washington to demand equality and justice for all and rights for all  citizens be enforced.Cool

For the sake of this dream of reality lets assume 200,000 concerned citizens show up in Washington.Smile All that possess weapons, and it should be all, should display their weapons permits clipped to their shirt pockets or lapel.Surprised I'M NOT SAYING BRING THE GUNSInnocent.... I'm saying just display the permits.Sealed Permits mean guns and ammo and the ability of the citizens to use them.Yell Hopefully, Washington would get the "subtle messgage" and figure out We, the People will step up and use force if necessary to effect change on the quislings in Washington.Tongue out

Amendment #1 states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishmnet of religion, or prohibiting the free execise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,InnocentSealed and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The second amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.Wink

So, We, the People, have the right to assemble and to bear arms.Cool Do We have the right to assemble and bear arms at the same time?Surprised I think We do!!! Instead of bearing arms, though, the displaying of the gun permits would be a peaceful way to petition for a redress of grievances and "demand".Tongue out Again, the display of the permits represents guns and ammo and maybe even a "pissed-off" citizenry.Yell

It could, however, "back-fire", and alert the government to a possible "skirmish" with an irate citizenry.Foot in mouth But "moles" on these websites like FireSociety probably have already reported a disgruntled citizenry, or at least a portion thereof, who would effect change by any means necessary including force.Yell That is one reason the current president passed a law, with no vote from anyone, to be able to declare marshall law.  The constitution covers that in Article 1, section 9: it states, among other things, The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it.  Keeping all options on the table, force should be the last alternative.Wink

But, mind you, We the People, are running out of options.Cry Certainly, We, the People, can't be blamed for the situation We find our country in a little over 7 years into the new millinium.Innocent We didn't sign CAFTA.Money mouth We didn't sign NAFTA.Money mouth We didn't sever the military in half.Cry We didn't meet with Fox and Martin to establish the NAU.YellMoney mouth For Christs sake, We didn't even get a vote on it.Frown The mawks in government, who have carved up the country like a spiral ham on Easter Sunday over the last 20-40 years are responsible.Yell

If people like the Bildenberg Group continue their agenda for world globalization, the day of the "Second shot heard 'round the world" may come sooner than later.Sealed Keep in mind it won't be a "rag-tag" group "hopped-up" on meth or crack. They will have a president and cabinet ready to step in and key military personnel will be involved.Surprised I wouldn't be surprized if plans are already in the works pending the outcome of the next "election" and the further destruction of the countrys heritage, culture, flag, and sovereignty.Cry

As they use to say in the old oaters, "It's time to head for the hills". Or should I say, "Head for the Hill".Wink


 

Head for the Hill
Started February 18, 2008 - First 2 of 13 comment(s)   View all comments
February 18, 2008 01:51 PM
Member Since:
February 15, 2007

Great article !  People need to be aware of what's going on around them.  There was a saying I had on a wall plaque that stated "remember to keep your words soft and sweet, you never know from day to day which ones you may have to eat!"  Well that's over now!   The words coming out of the mouths of people today are becoming more and more harsh and to the point.  This country is in need a a major turn around.  It must happen soon and it must be a lasting change.  The change is turning the country 'back' to the U.S. Constitution.  I hope people will be aware of how much has been taken from them in the name of "safety" when in fact there is "no" security in this country!  Their goal is to do enough damage to this country to have people demand that they take our rights away so that they will be safe?  Come on people!  Why have so many of our military men died in past wars to keep America a free, and safe place for the next generations?  They died for the U.S. and the Constitution!  Why would anyone demean the deaths of these wonderful patriots?  If you let them take our rights away then you are in fact demeaning all of the veterans in all past wars... Please take into consideration the troops that are currently fighting in Iraq.  What will they come home to?  Are they in fact fighting to protect the U.S. and our Constitution?  Are they going to come home to jobs and families in tact?  Could it be that they will come home to the North American Union instead?  Will they be asking us why we didn't protect our country from this take over?  After all, we are "We The People" and should be standing for something more than 'please protect us'!  The people today need to show half the guts that our ancestors  showed in settling this country!  It's time to take it back, and elect someone that would give us the hope of going in  the right direction...

 

 

February 18, 2008 05:56 PM
Member Since:
May 24, 2007

Comment updated February 18, 2008 06:23 PM

JHK, see you're still causing chaos! :>) Good on you brother. I had to take a break from this forum because a lot of my postings were being deleted and none of my new articles ever made it out of the pending area. Very biased in here but it is good to see you are still rocking.

You continue to voice my opinion from my very first written article 'Time for Another revoluton" I suppose I continue to be a prophet because more and more citizens are feeling the wrongs of the government and the awakening continues.

I have been doing extensive research on 9/11 and the war and the further I go into it and place all of the dots on the board and really start connecting timelines, comparing stories (mass media) study what architects and world renown pilots, demolition experts, piecing film together, and following the money, this is not looking good.

I just received information in the words from Prime Minister Bhutto that Osama Bin Laden is dead and was before her assassination. Fact of the matter is, she new too much and accidentally let the cat out of the bag.

If Osama Bin Laden is dead, why continue the war? Wasn't that the reason we started this war anyway. Oh yeah, I forgot, it changed from hunting Bin Laden to the war on terrorism. This way it can last even after Bin Laden was killed.

Truth of the matter is he was killed by an ISI Pakistani agent. Ever wonder why President bush said when asked about Bin Laden "he doesn't even give Bin Laden much thought. Ever wonder why Bin Laden has never been indicted with formal charges like all of the other terror suspects. According to Benazir Bhutto herself, a man named Saeed Sheikh (he is charged with killing Daniel Pearl) murdered Bin Laden.

The information is out there and everyone just has to keep looking for the answers and stop being worried about being called a conspiracy theorist or a kook or worst a domestic terrorist. Laws have been passed by the administration without a vote like you've mentioned to be able to have all of us detained if we ever made a massive stand and demanded the truth.

 The truth that 9/11 was invented to go to war with the Taliban in Afghanistan because we needed the oil pipline to the Caspian Sea basin. 12 trillion dollars worth of oil! If you want the answers, all you need to do is follow the money. Anyone ever heard of the Bridas corporation? Look it up for yourself and follow the money.

Karl Schwarz is a very good source of info.

Reason why we went to Afghanistan first:

1. The Caspian Sea Basin (Kazakstan, Turkmenistan etc.) holds between 11 and 12 TRILLION dollars in oil and gas resources

2. There are only three ways to get it out: - East to China - West through Iran, Russia, and Turkey to Europe - South through Afghanistan and Pakistan

3. The Taliban who controlled Afghanistan before 9/11 made pipeline deals with non-US companies and refused to change them to give control of the region's resources to the US. Follow the money. The true reason we went to war with Iraq (and if John Mccain has his way, will be there for 100 years) ,was because Saddam Hussein stopped using U.S. dollars for the oil and would only except EUROs. The only other country to do this so far is Venezuela. Iran will be next. When they do, that is when we will go to war with them as well.

Ever wonder why John McCain was out of the race then all of a sudden he became the front runner. This was not a mistake. This is rigged! He is the only one that would continue the war. I guess Huckabee didn't get the memo.

Long before the current Bush Adminstration, George Bush Sr., along with former government officials and the Bin Laden family of Saudi Arabia, created a private investment firm called the Carlyle Group.

The purpose of the company is to acquire interests in arms manufacturers. Because it is a privately owned company, it's dealings are only rarely reported on in the financial news, but it is one of the biggest beneficiaries of America's drive to war and it is making its investors very rich. Look it up for yourself. Follow the money.

Let's go back to 9/11. In the early hours right after the 9/11 attacks, Paul Bremer appeared on NBC suggesting that Osama bin Laden was responsible. He was one of the first to float the name. What Bremer failed to mention is that as he appeared on television calmly speculating about who was responsible, 1,700 of the employees the company he worked for were "missing" as a result of the attack on the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

It later turned out that over 200 were killed, one of the biggest losses of any organization that day. Two years later, Bush put Bremer in charge of rebuilding Iraq. There he decided against the advice of all military and diplomatic experts to disband Iraq's army and put 400,000 armed and trained and then-cooperative soldiers in the street without any means of support and a major grudge against the US. Bremer...on TV right after 9/11 starting the Osama did it myth and then in Iraq guaranteeing a massive and deadly insurgency.

What was Bremer doing before 9/11? Among other things, he was the Managing Director of Kissinger Associates. You know, Henry Kissinger. The former Harvard Professor turned adviser to the Rockefeller family who became Nixon's foreign affairs adviser during the Vietnam War which Nixon extended for eight years beyond LBJs term.

Still think the "botched" occupation of Iraq was a mistake or a surprise? Like Vietnam, the Iraq War is intended to bleed America dry financially and isolate it diplomatically - and the very same cast of characters have their fingerprints all over it and profiting from it. But try to find this very basic background information in the news media, mainstream or alternative.

What about our friends Pakistan? CIA = ISI (Pakistani intelligence) = al Queda On October 1, 2001, did the FBI uncover evidence that Lt. General Mahmood Ahmed, the Director of the Pakistani Intelligence Service (the ISI) authorize the wiring of $100,000 to Florida to Mohammed Atta (supposed hijack ringleader of the 911 attack) through Omar Saeed Sheikh (an alleged ISI agent)? Why did only a single US press outlet, the Wall Street Journal website, mention this connection in the editorial section (James Taranto writing) on October 10, 2001, saying it was an "internet only" story - when in fact it was a major story reported at great length in the main line Indian press?

Does this mean that Al-Queda was used as a tool by members of the American government in the same way that we used the Mujahdeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan?

That name was mentioned again. Saeed Sheikh. The same person Benazir Bhutto named as Bin Laden's killer in her interview with Frost over the world. Why was Benazir assasinated well I believe she knew too much and had to much support from the people and she would end the games that are being played over in Pakistan.

When Benazir Bhutto returned to Pakistan to take a stand for democratic government, 3 million Pakistanis greeted her at the airport. Now she is dead.

In an interview with David frost Benazir Bhutto refered in a matter-of-fact manner to "the man who killed Osama bin Laden." If this was a misstatement, she did not correct herself, nor did the interviewer call attention to it.

Before she was murdered, there was a previous attack on Bhutto's life. She told David Frost that she was not even allowed to file a police report let alone get a serious investigation of the attack. She stated that she specifically wanted the source of the financial support of the terrorists traced.

Saeed Sheikh is the man Bhutto refers to in this interview as being the killer of Osama bin Laden. Saeed Sheikh is charged with killing Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl who tracked the relationship between Pakistani intelligence and terrorist groups. Saeed Sheikh is also suspected of having wired money to Mohamed Atta on behalf of Pakistani intelligence right before the 9/11 attacks. President Bush & Company wholeheartedly support the current Pakistani regime.

I could go on and on for days and days but you need to find the truth for yourselves to really believe it. The dots are very connected for me and I continue to connect them. It does not make a pretty picture. The war on terrorism is a fraud, the Save Africa from AIDS compaign is a fraud and is nothing but a genocide with love but that is another story.

Since I started posting on Fire society in May 06, I've made some predictions that individuals have said that I was crazy and unpatriotic. Well, all of them have come true to this point. The last one I made was to invest in gold because of the fall of the dollar and the upcoming recession and depression. Well, I hope those of you that read my post heeded the warning. Gold has gone up over $200.00 since then and the dollar continues to fall. So now who is the kook?

Head for the Hill is right, but they will be waiting!

Hope fully this doesn't get removed by the police.


Post New Comment to the Discussion

You must login to discuss this item.