|
Ron Paul wants to organize a peaceful march on Washington very soon, he says. I sent an e-mail to the doctor explaining what I would do. I'm waiting for his response. Let me premise this with the fact that MLK got about a million people to descend on Washington to demand equality and justice for all and rights for all citizens be enforced. For the sake of this dream of reality lets assume 200,000 concerned citizens show up in Washington. All that possess weapons, and it should be all, should display their weapons permits clipped to their shirt pockets or lapel. I'M NOT SAYING BRING THE GUNS .... I'm saying just display the permits. Permits mean guns and ammo and the ability of the citizens to use them. Hopefully, Washington would get the "subtle messgage" and figure out We, the People will step up and use force if necessary to effect change on the quislings in Washington. Amendment #1 states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishmnet of religion, or prohibiting the free execise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The second amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. So, We, the People, have the right to assemble and to bear arms. Do We have the right to assemble and bear arms at the same time? I think We do!!! Instead of bearing arms, though, the displaying of the gun permits would be a peaceful way to petition for a redress of grievances and "demand". Again, the display of the permits represents guns and ammo and maybe even a "pissed-off" citizenry. It could, however, "back-fire", and alert the government to a possible "skirmish" with an irate citizenry. But "moles" on these websites like FireSociety probably have already reported a disgruntled citizenry, or at least a portion thereof, who would effect change by any means necessary including force. That is one reason the current president passed a law, with no vote from anyone, to be able to declare marshall law. The constitution covers that in Article 1, section 9: it states, among other things, The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it. Keeping all options on the table, force should be the last alternative. But, mind you, We the People, are running out of options. Certainly, We, the People, can't be blamed for the situation We find our country in a little over 7 years into the new millinium. We didn't sign CAFTA. We didn't sign NAFTA. We didn't sever the military in half. We didn't meet with Fox and Martin to establish the NAU. For Christs sake, We didn't even get a vote on it. The mawks in government, who have carved up the country like a spiral ham on Easter Sunday over the last 20-40 years are responsible. If people like the Bildenberg Group continue their agenda for world globalization, the day of the "Second shot heard 'round the world" may come sooner than later. Keep in mind it won't be a "rag-tag" group "hopped-up" on meth or crack. They will have a president and cabinet ready to step in and key military personnel will be involved. I wouldn't be surprized if plans are already in the works pending the outcome of the next "election" and the further destruction of the countrys heritage, culture, flag, and sovereignty. As they use to say in the old oaters, "It's time to head for the hills". Or should I say, "Head for the Hill". |