Tell Congress "No Pork Spending!"

By Grassfire.org Updates | February 19, 2008 04:37 PM

Printer Friendly Comments (60)
Login to Bookmark Email to a Friend
Rating Number of Ratings: 0

Login to Rate
 
[article image]

Two-thousand six-hundred and fifty-eight pet projects that cost taxpayers $13.2 billion 

The Omnibus Spending bill pushed through Congress last December gutted the Secure Fence Act. But left intact were thousands of “earmarks” that directed hundreds of millions of tax dollars to pet-projects and preferred supporters--all without public debate or even a vote in Congress.

Outrageously, just two months into the New Year, lawmakers have already begun soliciting earmark requests for 2008!

Earmarks have become a symbol of the culture of the widespread corruption on Capitol Hill, and as a valued Grassfire team member, I’m asking you to join with me right now by
signing our petition calling for an end to earmarks.

2007: A Banner Year for Pork

Citizens Against Government Waste reported that taxpayers
had funded 2,658 so-called “pork projects” for a whopping $13.2 billion!

            -- $1 million for Hillary Clinton’s “Hippie” museum
                in New York honoring the events of Woodstock.

               --$6 million to research new uses for wood.

               --$1.3 million to Raleigh, NC to build a year round,
                  “climate-controlled” park carousel.

In each instance, Congress didn’t debate them in the open, and there was never even a public vote!

Is it any wonder why Americans don’t trust our elected leaders?

30 Days to Make an Impact

The corrupting influence of earmarks has boiled over, and I’m relying on members of our team to help me rally 100,000 citizens who are standing with me and demanding an end to earmarks!

Here’s what we are calling for:

               -- an immediate one-year moratorium on earmarks.

               --Congress to pass a permanent legislative or
                  constitutional solution that bans earmarks.

              --Presidential and Congressional candidates to pledge to
                 support the one-year moratorium as well as the
                 permanent ban.

It would be difficult to find a more self-serving and corruptive practice than earmarks. That is why I am asking ALL members of our team to join with me right now to help bring earmarks to an end by
clicking here.

Thank you for adding your name to this important petition. Please forward this message on to your friends and family as well.

Steve


 

Tell Congress "No Pork Spending!"
Started February 19, 2008 - First 2 of 60 comment(s)   View all comments
February 20, 2008 04:24 PM
Member Since:
September 11, 2007

Parallel thoughts................

Tell the sun not to rise

Tell the Pope not to be catholic

Tell the muslims to give up Jerusalem

Tell Algore to adopt global cooling.....

You guys are smoking some strange stuff.  When a person is elected to public office, their only focus is on getting re-elected using whatever it takes.  Since our money becomes their money by definition, dumping it back into the home court buys the re-election.

Here's some money for a pet project and someone else is paying for it. What's not to like??  Tax rates need to be 75% in 2050 to make up the shortfall??  Hey, I'll be back to dust by then, there'll be millions for my family in Swiss or Cayman Banks.  Meantime,I'm loving all this money and power. Go pick on somebody else, you little nobody in flyover country..

A Trillion here, a Trillion there, pretty soon you're talking some real money. Hey, we're gonna change the motto on our money to....."In Congress We Trust".  Don't like that??  Let's see!!!  Get me his FBI file, look up his SS# and call the IRS.

February 20, 2008 06:22 PM
Member Since:
February 16, 2007

If you truly want to get rid of earmarks then you have to get rid of the people who place them in the budget.  Entrenched politicians no longer represent the will of the people who elect them but cater to special interests.  Throw the bums out of office and your word will get through.

 

We need a national refernendum and term limits at the federal level.  We limit the President so why not Congress? 


Post New Comment to the Discussion

You must login to discuss this item.