Disappearing Marriage Issue (05.09.08 Briefing)By Steve Elliott (Grassfire) | May 9, 2008 09:48 AM |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
*The disappearing marriage issue *How marriage dominated the 2004 elections *How the Left is avoiding/downplaying the marriage issue *Flushing your tax dollars down a Carbon Hole 05.09.08 Briefing • Steve Elliott, Grassfire.org • Subscribe here • RSS The disappearing marriage issue One of the big unasked questions of the 2008 presidential race is, "Whatever happened to the marriage issue?" It would be an easy question to answer if there was no controversy and nothing to talk about. But that is not the case. Vermont Strategy working for homosexual activists. This week, a New York court of appeals ruled that the state would recognize same-sex marriages from other states and countries (in this case, Canada) -- despite the fact that same-sex unions are outlawed in New York. This comes while the Supreme Courts in Vermont and Virginia are engaged in a legal tug-of-war that hinges on whether Virginia must recognize a Vermont same-sex union. That case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition, the California Supreme Court is currently deciding a case to determine whether traditional marriage is constitutional in that state. Why is this not a political issue in 2008? Fast forward to 2008. Ironically, the same issue that ignited the marriage debate in 2004 -- the San Francisco mayor's push to issue marriage licenses -- is still at the center of the legal controversy surrounding marriage. The California Supreme Court case I mentioned earlier will decide that original 2004 legal dispute involving the San Francisco mayor. So, why is this not a political issue in the 2008 race for the presidency? First, the Left got smarter. Marriage is a losing issue for the Left because their ideology and their base supports homosexual marriage. So the Left has gone silent. Homosexual activists are relatively quiet and political leaders try to support "marriage" and the "rights" of homosexuals at the same time. Second, this is not a key issue for John McCain. In fact, he opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment although his position on the issue does line up with marriage advocates on most other points. Third, the media is barely taking notice. And if the media does not bring the issue front-and-center on a regular basis, the candidates do not feel the need to address the issue. In the case of the disappearing marriage issue, the Left clearly has the advantage. $126,600,000 of your tax dollars flushed down the "Carbon Hole" On the Web today: Obama open to Clinton "Dream Ticket" | |||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
| Disappearing Marriage Issue (05.09.08 Briefing) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Post New Comment to the Discussion | ||||||||||||||||||
|
You must login to discuss this item. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|