Bad News for the Goracle

By Steve Elliott (Grassfire) | July 10, 2007 01:29 PM

Printer Friendly Comments (5)
Login to Bookmark Email to a Friend
Rating Number of Ratings: 3

Login to Rate
 
[article image]

Bad news for the Goracle.. We're Actually in a Climatological "Golden Age"

Ran across an excellent article by Joseph D'Aleo of the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project which lays out the flaws in the global warming hype

Click here to read.

D'Aleo challenge the "consensus" on some key points:

--the real cost to American families ($4,500 per family in 8 years)
--the lack of accounting for the reduction in the global temperature reporting stations since 1990, when global warming coincientally spiked
--the ignorance of the impact of the sun which will likely prove to be the real cause of global climate change.

The article concludes by pointing out the the data suggests that we may be entering a season of cooling and the past 30 years may be looked on by historians as the "golden age" of climate prosperity:

These three factors suggest a cooling is about to begin. In fact, there are a number of measures, such as ocean heat content (which has not increased in the last 4 years), satellite-derived atmospheric temperatures, and ocean and land temperatures, which are all showing a cooling period over the last 5 to 8 years. It is possible either 1998 or 2001 will end up being the peak of this current warm cycle....

Lost in all of this is the fact that we have had an optimum climate the last 30 years – with warmer temperatures, more rainfall, and increased CO2 – that has enabled us to grow more food in more places, and consume less energy than had the cold weather of the 60s and 70s persisted. Descending back into a little Ice Age has far greater negative consequences than a slow and relative minor warming. Crop failures and famines are more common due to dryness and cold, and the world would consume more energy for heating. We may look back at the late 20th and early 21st centuries as the golden years.

 


 

Bad News for the Goracle
Started July 10, 2007 - First 2 of 5 comment(s)   View all comments
July 11, 2007 09:52 AM
Member Since:
February 24, 2007

As I've posted before...Nostradomus, The Mayan Indians, The Hopi Indians, and Edgar Cayce all predict a climate shift in the year 2012. The earth has been heating and cooling for billions of years. I'm of the opinion the shift has already started and will be ending in 2012 to 2014, based on the research I have done. One projection is that melting Artic Ice could cause a flow of freah water into the North Atlantic that would shut down the Gulf Stream this century. That warm current moderates the European climate, and turning it off would make a swath of land from London to Stockholm miserable. (Remember Greenland was exactly what the name insinuates, now it's covered with ice and in most parts frozen.)

The chief cause of the hole in the ozone, which appeared over Antarctica in the final decades of the 20th century, was chlorofluorocarbons, used in refrigerants and as propellants in spray cans. Had chemists earlier in the century decided to use bromine instead of chlorine to produce coolants--a mere quirk of chemistry--the ozone whole would have been far larger, occured all year and severly affected life. According to this information there is no more ozone.

There have been 171 climate shifts that have occured in the history of the planet that man knows of. Such shifts have occured before. A tiny change in the Earth's orbit, for example, altered precipatation and temperature patterns enough to convert what was once fertile African savanna into today's dry Sahara. "There are caves in today's desert that show giraffes and all kinds of other animals," said Robert J. Scholes, a South African climatologist.

Do your own research. I've been following this subject for about 10 years now. Read whatever you can get your hands on.

"An Icon will stand in water to it's knees."                                                    JHK

July 11, 2007 09:54 AM
Member Since:
February 24, 2007
In the above post I meant to say there is no more HOLE in the ozone. Not no more ozone. Sorry. There is no way to edit these posts once one has been sent.

Post New Comment to the Discussion

You must login to discuss this item.